H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sybille Niox Chateau vs Petra Langrova H2H: 0-1

Petra Langrova holds a 1–0 lead over Sybille Niox Chateau in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Langrova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Langrova won the 1988 Paris round of 32 6-4 6-1.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Langrova #201 6-4 6-1 Sybille Niox Chateau Match data Sep 22, 1988* R32 Paris WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sybille Niox Chateau 1,530 16 35 31.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Petra Langrova #895 #53 453 1,700 81 117 40.9% 0 0 0 1 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Petra Langrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0
17 1987 2–2 50.0% 1,505 0 0
18 1988 5–10 33.3% 1,492 0 0 1988 5–2 71.4% #100 1,581 0 1
19 1989 0–4 0.0% 1,463 0 0 1989 12–16 42.9% #78 1,620 0 1
20 1990 0–2 0.0% 1,451 0 0 1990 12–15 44.4% #80 1,616 0 1
21 1991 4–5 44.4% 1,487 0 0 1991 14–19 42.4% #86 1,597 0 1
22 1992 5–11 31.2% 1,455 0 0 1992 8–14 36.4% #134 1,561 0 1
23 1993 7–11 38.9% #103 1,558 0 1
24 1994 5–9 35.7% #106 1,568 0 1
25 1995 7–10 41.2% #137 1,571 0 1
26 1996 7–6 53.8% #66 1,626 0 1
27 1997 4–14 22.2% #133 1,523 0 1
28 1998 0–1 0.0% #249 1,509 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Petra Langrova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1987 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1988 5 0 5 100.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 2 7 9 22.2% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 3 6 9 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
22 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1993 1 1 2 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1994 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1995 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1996 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 4 9 13 30.8% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1998 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 2 7 9 22.2% 14 26 40 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 16 33 49 32.7% 54 63 117 46.2% 1 7 8 12.5% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Petra Langrova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1485 99.7 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.20
17 1987 1506 101.0 +29 44.4% -0.89 1–0 +0.40
18 1988 1492 111.7 +26 +38 42.9% -0.37 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) +0.44 1988 1581 119.1 +77 62.5% +0.50 2–0 3–1 (75%) +1.11
19 1989 1463 104.7 +49 11.1% -3.11 0–1 1–0 -0.19 1989 1621 121.4 -125 +103 43.9% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 102.8 +0.67
20 1990 1451 98.8 20.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.29 1990 1616 124.6 -72 +52 47.6% -0.25 3–6 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.6 -0.15
21 1991 1487 107.4 +21 44.4% -0.50 0–2 1–0 +0.31 1991 1597 128.3 -3 +40 40.3% -0.51 5–3 (63%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 +0.13
22 1992 1456 101.8 +21 +40 36.1% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.3 +1.26 1992 1562 116.3 +4 +55 40.4% -0.72 6–7 (46%) 2–4 (33%) 98.3 +0.27
23 1993 1559 114.9 +30 +27 45.0% -0.57 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.5 -0.13
24 1994 1568 112.8 -26 +63 43.2% -0.95 3–6 (33%) 1–1 +0.21
25 1995 1572 110.3 -25 +25 40.5% -0.51 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) -0.06
26 1996 1626 114.6 -34 -13 53.3% +0.07 4–2 (67%) 1–0 +0.08
27 1997 1523 109.5 +46 +26 26.3% -1.79 0–2 +0.21
28 1998 1509 97.6 33.3% -3.33 0–1 +0.03
Career 1531 107.6 +24 +35 37.4% -0.99 2–13 (13%) 6–4 (60%) 91.3 +4.18 1701 124.6 -24 +47 42.9% -0.60 32–37 (46%) 18–22 (45%) 98.9 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.