H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sybille Niox Chateau vs Sandra Wasserman H2H: 0-1

Sandra Wasserman holds a 1–0 lead over Sybille Niox Chateau in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sandra Wasserman leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Wasserman won the 1988 Barcelona round of 16 6-1 2-6 7-6.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
BEL Age 56 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Wasserman #94 6-1 2-6 7-6 Sybille Niox Chateau Match data Apr 29, 1988* R16 Barcelona WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sybille Niox Chateau 1,530 16 35 31.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Wasserman #747 #48 22 1,701 77 93 45.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Sandra Wasserman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,485 0 0
17 1987 2–2 50.0% 1,505 0 0 1987 7–4 63.6% #123 1,596 0 0
18 1988 5–10 33.3% 1,492 0 0 1988 19–18 51.4% #63 1,643 0 0
19 1989 0–4 0.0% 1,463 0 0 1989 18–17 51.4% #69 1,632 0 0
20 1990 0–2 0.0% 1,451 0 0 1990 12–17 41.4% #103 1,607 0 0
21 1991 4–5 44.4% 1,487 0 0 1991 6–10 37.5% #131 1,583 0 0
22 1992 5–11 31.2% 1,455 0 0 1992 3–8 27.3% #135 1,538 0 0
23 1993 8–11 42.1% #112 1,556 0 0
24 1994 4–8 33.3% #198 1,540 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Sandra Wasserman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
18 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1988 8 5 13 61.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 13 8 21 61.9% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 1 4 5 20.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1994 3 7 10 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
Career 2 7 9 22.2% 14 26 40 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 42 43 85 49.4% 30 39 69 43.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 6 9 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sybille Niox Chateau Sandra Wasserman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1986 1485 99.7 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.20
17 1987 1506 101.0 +29 44.4% -0.89 1–0 +0.40 1987 1596 125.6 +39 64.0% +1.32 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.79
18 1988 1492 111.7 +26 +38 42.9% -0.37 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) +0.44 1988 1644 115.1 -32 +14 -112 51.1% +0.01 8–8 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 100.3 +4.28
19 1989 1463 104.7 +49 11.1% -3.11 0–1 1–0 -0.19 1989 1633 118.0 +44 -43 50.6% +0.13 5–6 (45%) 0–5 (0%) 96.1 +3.24
20 1990 1451 98.8 20.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.29 1990 1608 122.9 +64 -90 44.1% -0.71 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 98.4 -0.61
21 1991 1487 107.4 +21 44.4% -0.50 0–2 1–0 +0.31 1991 1583 107.2 +19 -21 36.1% -1.03 3–1 (75%) 2–3 (40%) 101.4 +0.37
22 1992 1456 101.8 +21 +40 36.1% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.3 +1.26 1992 1539 107.3 +30 +11 33.3% -1.13 0–2 0–1 +0.37
23 1993 1556 112.7 +1 +2 42.9% -0.43 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) +0.49
24 1994 1540 109.0 -5 30.8% -1.23 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.0 -0.21
Career 1531 107.6 +24 +35 37.4% -0.99 2–13 (13%) 6–4 (60%) 91.3 +4.18 1702 120.3 +26 -5 -112 45.9% -0.30 25–29 (46%) 16–19 (46%) 95.3 +5.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.