H2H data updated: 2026-10-25 00:00 UTC

Sylvia Hanika vs Andrea Jaeger H2H: 2-10

Andrea Jaeger holds a 10–2 lead over Sylvia Hanika in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Andrea Jaeger leads 6–1 on carpet and 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1983 Washington Open semifinal 6-7 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sylvia Hanika
GER Age 66 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 10
12 main-draw meetings
Andrea Jaeger
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sylvia Hanika 6-7 6-3 7-5 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jan 8, 1983* SF Washington Open WTA 500 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-2 6-1 Sylvia Hanika Match data Nov 20, 1982* SF Tokyo Lion Cup WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-0 6-4 Sylvia Hanika Match data Oct 17, 1981* SF Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Sylvia Hanika 4-6 6-1 6-4 Andrea Jaeger Match data Jun 6, 1981* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Andrea Jaeger 6-2 6-3 Sylvia Hanika Match data May 2, 1981* QF Orlando WTA 250 Clay
Andrea Jaeger 6-4 5-7 6-4 Sylvia Hanika Match data Mar 22, 1981 SF WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-2 6-3 Sylvia Hanika Match data Mar 22, 1981 R16 WTA Finals WTA Finals Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-4 6-3 Sylvia Hanika Match data Mar 7, 1981* SF Los Angeles WTA 500 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-2 7-5 Sylvia Hanika Match data Jan 17, 1981* QF Kansas City WTA 250 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-3 6-3 Sylvia Hanika Match data Nov 15, 1980* QF Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Andrea Jaeger 6-0 6-4 Sylvia Hanika Match data Sep 20, 1980* SF Las Vegas WTA 250 Hard
Andrea Jaeger 6-2 6-3 Sylvia Hanika Match data Aug 23, 1980* SF Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sylvia Hanika — #5 48 2,137 415 239 63.5% 0 0 1 0 8 9
Andrea Jaeger — #3 — 2,265 262 91 74.2% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sylvia Hanika Andrea Jaeger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1979 2–2 50.0% — 1,522 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1980 67–18 78.8% #7 2,156 0 5
16 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,533 0 0 1981 61–18 77.2% #4 2,181 0 8
17 1977 5–3 62.5% — 1,583 0 0 1982 65–21 75.6% #3 2,202 0 10
18 1978 27–14 65.9% — 1,817 0 1 1983 50–18 73.5% #3 2,105 0 11
19 1979 26–16 61.9% — 1,950 0 3 1984 9–6 60.0% #42 2,025 0 11
20 1980 40–22 64.5% — 2,003 0 4 1985 5–5 50.0% — 1,940 0 11
21 1981 61–23 72.6% #6 2,085 0 6 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,915 0 11
22 1982 41–23 64.1% #10 1,946 0 7 1987 3–2 60.0% — 1,900 0 11
23 1983 47–22 68.1% #5 1,970 0 7 — — — — — — —
24 1984 29–20 59.2% #17 1,880 0 8 — — — — — — —
25 1985 22–16 57.9% — 1,868 0 8 — — — — — — —
26 1986 14–14 50.0% #50 1,803 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 1987 32–19 62.7% #14 1,919 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 1988 44–22 66.7% #17 1,919 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1989 18–14 56.2% #41 1,806 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1990 7–10 41.2% #123 1,702 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sylvia Hanika Andrea Jaeger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 25 4 29 86.2% 9 4 13 69.2% 14 3 17 82.4% 19 7 26 73.1%
16 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1981 8 3 11 72.7% 15 3 18 83.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 22 7 29 75.9%
17 1977 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1982 17 6 23 73.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 22 6 28 78.6%
18 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1983 6 2 8 75.0% 23 5 28 82.1% 9 2 11 81.8% 12 9 21 57.1%
19 1979 5 5 10 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1984 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 1985 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1981 15 6 21 71.4% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 26 10 36 72.2% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 1987 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 28 12 40 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 10 6 16 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 60 159 62.3% 129 64 193 66.8% 38 32 70 54.3% 144 80 224 64.3% — 65 21 86 75.6% 66 21 87 75.9% 50 14 64 78.1% 80 34 114 70.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sylvia Hanika Andrea Jaeger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1522 115.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — 0–1 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2157 165.9 — — — — -8 -425 -301 74.7% +1.98 9–3 (75%) 6–1 (86%) 114.0 -6.95
16 1976 1533 101.8 — — — — +88 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 1–1 — +0.64 1981 2182 174.7 — — — — +39 -160 -157 70.3% +1.78 15–5 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 106.7 -9.51
17 1977 1584 118.4 — — — — +75 -25 — 55.6% +1.28 2–0 1–1 — +1.84 1982 2203 174.6 — — — — +59 -31 -141 73.9% +1.87 12–2 (86%) 7–2 (78%) 109.9 -8.79
18 1978 1817 145.6 — — — — -62 -183 -96 62.6% +1.14 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.8 +0.65 1983 2105 170.2 — — — — -3 +149 +46 70.7% +1.71 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 96.1 -4.08
19 1979 1951 158.3 — — — — -90 -104 -188 57.9% +0.65 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 106.6 -2.46 1984 2025 144.9 — — — — +15 — — 65.5% +1.52 0–1 0–2 — -0.43
20 1980 2003 159.4 — — — — +15 -68 -218 61.3% +0.93 11–4 (73%) 4–5 (44%) 105.0 -6.31 1985 1940 112.8 — — — — +12 — — 47.6% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.48
21 1981 2085 166.5 — — — — -7 +24 — 68.4% +1.72 12–7 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.1 -8.73 1986 1915 98.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
22 1982 1946 157.2 — — — — +137 +62 -221 64.4% +1.18 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 94.3 -1.96 1987 1901 104.0 — — — — — +248 — 60.0% +0.70 2–0 — — +0.19
23 1983 1971 163.0 — — — — +82 +36 -191 63.4% +1.12 17–8 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 -1.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1984 1880 145.2 — — — — +103 +50 -140 58.5% +0.42 10–4 (71%) 5–0 (100%) 105.7 -0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1985 1868 147.5 — — — — +28 +92 — 59.5% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 99.6 -2.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1986 1804 136.3 — — — — +9 +158 -98 51.6% -0.02 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.6 -0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1987 1920 155.2 — — — — +18 +3 -153 62.2% +0.91 7–10 (41%) 3–5 (38%) 96.5 -1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 1919 153.4 — — — — +53 +15 -188 61.6% +0.85 14–5 (74%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 1806 132.5 — — — — +29 +122 — 52.9% +0.26 9–1 (90%) 4–4 (50%) 103.4 +0.41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1703 116.6 — — — — +42 +152 — 50.0% -0.35 2–6 (25%) — — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2138 160.0 — — — — +39 +22 -162 61.2% +0.90 114–67 (63%) 50–53 (49%) 100.0 -3.45 — 2266 172.3 — — — — +22 -43 -157 71.0% +1.71 46–18 (72%) 22–18 (55%) 109.1 -8.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.