H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sylvia Hanika vs Beverly Bowes H2H: 1-1

Sylvia Hanika and Beverly Bowes are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on grass, while Beverly Bowes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Beverly Bowes won the 1987 Toronto second round 2-6 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sylvia Hanika
GER Age 66 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Beverly Bowes
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 1987 Toronto WTA 250 R64 Hard Beverly Bowes #68 2-6 6-3 6-1 Sylvia Hanika #14 Match data
Jun 22, 1983* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Sylvia Hanika 6-3 6-2 Beverly Bowes Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sylvia Hanika #223 #6 48 2,137 414 238 63.5% 0 0 1 0 8 9
Beverly Bowes #597 #49 16 1,678 69 120 36.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sylvia Hanika Beverly Bowes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1977 5–3 62.5% — 1,583 0 0 1983 3–6 33.3% — 1,526 0 0
18 1978 27–14 65.9% — 1,817 0 1 1984 1–5 16.7% #161 1,480 0 0
19 1979 26–16 61.9% — 1,945 0 3 1985 6–6 50.0% #170 1,525 0 0
20 1980 40–22 64.5% — 1,995 0 4 1986 6–8 42.9% #100 1,586 0 0
21 1981 61–23 72.6% — 2,093 0 6 1987 7–18 28.0% #75 1,591 0 0
22 1982 41–23 64.1% — 1,937 0 7 1988 14–19 42.4% #62 1,640 0 0
23 1983 47–22 68.1% — 1,966 0 7 1989 13–19 40.6% #101 1,619 0 0
24 1984 29–20 59.2% #17 1,878 0 8 1990 5–13 27.8% #147 1,536 0 0
25 1985 22–16 57.9% #19 1,859 0 8 1991 2–5 28.6% #156 1,520 0 0
26 1986 14–14 50.0% #50 1,790 0 9 1992 3–8 27.3% #113 1,510 0 0
27 1987 32–19 62.7% #14 1,918 0 9 1993 8–11 42.1% #130 1,550 0 0
28 1988 43–21 67.2% #17 1,918 0 9 1994 1–2 33.3% #426 1,556 0 0
29 1989 18–14 56.2% #41 1,807 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1990 7–10 41.2% #123 1,703 0 9 — — — — — — —