H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sylvia Hanika vs Iva Budarova H2H: 3-0
Sylvia Hanika holds a 3–0 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sylvia Hanika leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1982 Oakland third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1982* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sylvia Hanika | 6-4 6-1 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Nov 24, 1979* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sylvia Hanika | 7-6 6-2 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1979* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Sylvia Hanika | 6-4 6-1 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sylvia Hanika | Iva Budarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |