H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Sylvia Hanika vs Jo Durie H2H: 7-0

Sylvia Hanika holds a 7–0 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Sylvia Hanika leads 6–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1987 Princeton third round 3-6 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sylvia Hanika
GER Age 66 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 26, 1987* Princeton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Sylvia Hanika #21 3-6 6-4 6-3 Jo Durie #24 Match data
Aug 24, 1985* Monticello WTA 250 QF Hard Sylvia Hanika #19 2-6 7-5 7-6 Jo Durie #50 Match data
Oct 28, 1984* Brighton WTA 250 QF Carpet Sylvia Hanika #19 6-4 6-4 Jo Durie #15 Match data
Mar 6, 1982* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Carpet Sylvia Hanika 6-2 6-1 Jo Durie Match data
Oct 31, 1981* Filderstadt WTA 250 QF Carpet Sylvia Hanika 6-1 6-4 Jo Durie Match data
Oct 23, 1981* Brighton WTA 250 R16 Carpet Sylvia Hanika 7-5 6-1 Jo Durie Match data
Feb 5, 1978* Bremen WTA 250 SF Carpet Sylvia Hanika 6-2 6-3 Jo Durie Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sylvia Hanika #223 #6 48 2,137 414 238 63.5% 0 0 1 0 8 9
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sylvia Hanika Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,533 0 0 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0
17 1977 5–3 62.5% — 1,583 0 0 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1
18 1978 27–14 65.9% — 1,817 0 1 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1979 26–16 61.9% — 1,945 0 3 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4
20 1980 40–22 64.5% — 1,995 0 4 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1981 61–23 72.6% — 2,093 0 6 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1982 41–23 64.1% — 1,937 0 7 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9
23 1983 47–22 68.1% — 1,966 0 7 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9
24 1984 29–20 59.2% #17 1,878 0 8 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9
25 1985 22–16 57.9% #19 1,859 0 8 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1986 14–14 50.0% #50 1,790 0 9 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 1987 32–19 62.7% #14 1,918 0 9 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9
28 1988 43–21 67.2% #17 1,918 0 9 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 1989 18–14 56.2% #41 1,807 0 9 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9
30 1990 7–10 41.2% #123 1,703 0 9 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9