H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sylvia Hanika vs Joanne Russell H2H: 3-2
Sylvia Hanika holds a 3–2 lead over Joanne Russell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sylvia Hanika leads 3–0 on carpet, while Joanne Russell leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1984 Brighton final 6-3 1-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
2
5 main draw meetings
Age 71
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1984* | Brighton | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Sylvia Hanika | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | Joanne Russell | Match data |
| Oct 22, 1982* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sylvia Hanika | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Joanne Russell | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1982* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Joanne Russell | 6-4 6-7 6-3 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| Mar 5, 1982* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Sylvia Hanika | 6-2 6-3 | Joanne Russell | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1981* | Nassau | WTA 250 | QF | — | Joanne Russell | 1-6 6-4 7-6 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Joanne Russell | — | — | — | 1,935 | 203 | 199 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sylvia Hanika | Joanne Russell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 20–22 | 47.6% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 5 |