H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sylvia Hanika vs Kathrin Keil H2H: 2-0
Sylvia Hanika holds a 2–0 lead over Kathrin Keil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1983 Detroit third round 6-1 6-7 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 63
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 1983* | Detroit | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Sylvia Hanika | 6-1 6-7 6-2 | Kathrin Keil | Match data |
| Jul 16, 1982* | Monte Carlo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Sylvia Hanika | 6-1 7-5 | Kathrin Keil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Kathrin Keil | — | — | — | 1,703 | 45 | 55 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sylvia Hanika | Kathrin Keil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |