H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sylvia Hanika vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-1
Sylvia Hanika holds a 2–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1987 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Sylvia Hanika | 6-3 6-3 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Feb 7, 1987* | Wichita | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 6-3 6-3 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sylvia Hanika | 6-2 5-7 6-4 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sylvia Hanika | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |