H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Sylvia Hanika vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 2-1

Sylvia Hanika holds a 2–1 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1987 Wimbledon round of 64 6-3 6-3.

GER Age 66 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 1
3 main-draw meetings
URS Age 60 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sylvia Hanika #20 6-3 6-3 Larisa Savchenko #22 Match data Jun 26, 1987* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Larisa Savchenko #29 6-3 6-3 Sylvia Hanika #43 Match data Feb 7, 1987* QF Wichita WTA 250 Carpet
Sylvia Hanika 6-2 5-7 6-4 Larisa Savchenko Match data Sep 1, 1983* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sylvia Hanika #223 #5 48 2,135 415 239 63.5% 0 0 1 0 8 9
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 240 241 49.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sylvia Hanika Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1976 2–1 66.7% 1,533 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,498 0 0
17 1977 5–3 62.5% 1,583 0 0 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,506 0 0
18 1978 27–14 65.9% 1,818 0 1 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,673 0 0
19 1979 26–16 61.9% 1,949 0 3 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,752 0 0
20 1980 40–22 64.5% 2,000 0 4 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,793 0 0
21 1981 61–23 72.6% #6 2,082 0 6 1988 28–17 62.2% #16 1,869 0 0
22 1982 41–23 64.1% #10 1,944 0 7 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,861 0 0
23 1983 47–22 68.1% #5 1,969 0 7 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,706 0 0
24 1984 29–20 59.2% #17 1,879 0 8 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,699 0 1
25 1985 22–16 57.9% #19 1,868 0 8 1992 18–19 48.6% #58 1,720 0 1
26 1986 14–14 50.0% #50 1,803 0 9 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,752 0 2
27 1987 32–19 62.7% #14 1,920 0 9 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
28 1988 44–22 66.7% #17 1,919 0 9 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,650 0 2
29 1989 18–14 56.2% #41 1,806 0 9 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,668 0 2
30 1990 7–10 41.2% #123 1,702 0 9 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,620 0 2
31 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,652 0 2
32 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,585 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sylvia Hanika Larisa Savchenko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1977 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1984 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
18 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 1 4 75.0%
19 1979 5 5 10 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 1987 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1981 15 6 21 71.4% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 26 10 36 72.2% 1988 17 10 27 63.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 1989 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
23 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 28 12 40 70.0% 1990 3 9 12 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1984 10 6 16 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 1 6 83.3%
25 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1992 9 8 17 52.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1993 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 5 11 54.5%
27 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1994 6 8 14 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 3 8 11 27.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 1989 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1999 0 3 3 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 99 60 159 62.3% 129 64 193 66.8% 38 32 70 54.3% 144 80 224 64.3% 97 102 199 48.7% 27 47 74 36.5% 70 46 116 60.3% 46 46 92 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sylvia Hanika Larisa Savchenko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1976 1533 101.8 +88 66.7% +0.50 1–1 +0.64 1983 1498 109.6 33.3% -1.33 0–1 -0.18
17 1977 1583 118.4 +76 -23 55.6% +1.28 2–0 1–1 +1.08 1984 1507 116.6 +100 +55 40.0% -0.87 1–2 (33%) +0.25
18 1978 1818 145.7 -59 -184 -96 62.6% +1.14 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.8 +0.92 1985 1674 126.0 -46 -159 -3 44.2% -0.31 9–6 (60%) 3–5 (38%) 104.0 -0.37
19 1979 1950 158.1 -89 -104 -186 57.9% +0.65 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 106.5 -2.88 1986 1752 135.5 -106 -188 +58 51.2% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 103.9 -1.29
20 1980 2000 158.9 +10 -66 -216 61.3% +0.93 11–4 (73%) 4–5 (44%) 105.0 -5.90 1987 1793 136.6 -74 -246 +115 60.8% +0.61 5–2 (71%) 2–5 (29%) 102.1 +1.13
21 1981 2083 166.3 -7 +24 68.4% +1.72 12–7 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.1 -8.48 1988 1870 156.5 -44 +85 56.9% +0.37 13–8 (62%) 11–6 (65%) 107.7 -2.81
22 1982 1945 156.9 +135 +62 -221 64.4% +1.18 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 94.4 -3.08 1989 1862 145.0 +27 -238 +26 60.2% +0.39 5–10 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 94.3 -0.82
23 1983 1970 162.8 +80 +36 -190 63.4% +1.12 17–8 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 -1.00 1990 1707 132.7 -4 -54 +235 43.7% -0.39 8–5 (62%) 2–5 (29%) 97.9 -0.20
24 1984 1880 145.1 +102 +49 -140 58.5% +0.42 10–4 (71%) 5–0 (100%) 105.7 -0.52 1991 1699 122.6 +18 -58 +204 53.7% +0.02 6–6 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 99.3 +1.48
25 1985 1868 147.4 +26 +92 59.5% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 99.7 -2.48 1992 1721 141.5 +9 -77 +179 49.4% -0.16 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 96.8 -1.79
26 1986 1804 136.2 +8 +158 -100 51.6% -0.02 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.6 -0.61 1993 1753 140.6 +6 -113 +158 52.3% -0.05 7–5 (58%) 3–6 (33%) 98.9 -0.11
27 1987 1921 155.2 +18 +1 -154 62.2% +0.91 7–10 (41%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -1.68 1994 1809 144.2 -28 -170 +83 48.4% -0.13 7–6 (54%) 6–4 (60%) 102.0 -3.68
28 1988 1919 153.3 +53 +15 -189 61.6% +0.85 14–5 (74%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 -1.35 1995 1650 126.3 +4 -8 +193 39.1% -0.65 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 99.9 +0.43
29 1989 1806 132.5 +30 +122 52.9% +0.26 9–1 (90%) 4–4 (50%) 103.4 +0.61 1996 1668 126.6 -51 -53 +258 44.1% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 0–2 -1.58
30 1990 1703 116.6 +42 +152 50.0% -0.35 2–6 (25%) +0.80 1997 1621 121.0 +6 -24 +203 38.0% -0.46 5–3 (63%) 0–6 (0%) 97.6 +0.42
31 1998 1653 111.5 -22 -84 +168 48.8% -0.10 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 102.7 +0.09
32 1999 1586 92.7 -28 -65 +209 28.0% -2.28 2–3 (40%) +0.24
Career 2136 159.8 +38 +22 -162 61.2% +0.90 114–67 (63%) 50–53 (49%) 100.1 -3.69 1927 142.7 -21 -97 +127 49.6% -0.13 96–79 (55%) 46–56 (45%) 98.2 -1.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.