H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sylvia Hanika vs Laura Arraya H2H: 3-1
Sylvia Hanika holds a 3–1 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Sylvia Hanika leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1990 Washington third round 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1990 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Laura Arraya | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1989* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sylvia Hanika | 6-2 6-4 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1983* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Sylvia Hanika | 6-1 6-3 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1983* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sylvia Hanika | 6-3 6-1 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sylvia Hanika | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |