H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Sylvia Hanika vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 2-1

Sylvia Hanika holds a 2–1 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1989 Filderstadt third round 6-2 4-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sylvia Hanika
GER Age 66 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 1989* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Carpet Sylvia Hanika #30 6-2 4-6 7-6 Lori Mcneil #23 Match data
Aug 29, 1987* Mahwah WTA 250 SF Hard Sylvia Hanika #14 6-4 2-6 6-2 Lori Mcneil #11 Match data
Mar 19, 1987* Dallas WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #13 6-2 4-6 6-2 Sylvia Hanika #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sylvia Hanika #223 #6 48 2,137 414 238 63.5% 0 0 1 0 8 9
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sylvia Hanika Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,533 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1977 5–3 62.5% — 1,583 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1978 27–14 65.9% — 1,817 0 1 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1979 26–16 61.9% — 1,945 0 3 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1980 40–22 64.5% — 1,995 0 4 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1981 61–23 72.6% — 2,093 0 6 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1982 41–23 64.1% — 1,937 0 7 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1983 47–22 68.1% — 1,966 0 7 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1984 29–20 59.2% #17 1,878 0 8 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1985 22–16 57.9% #19 1,859 0 8 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1986 14–14 50.0% #50 1,790 0 9 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1987 32–19 62.7% #14 1,918 0 9 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1988 43–21 67.2% #17 1,918 0 9 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1989 18–14 56.2% #41 1,807 0 9 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1990 7–10 41.2% #123 1,703 0 9 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11