H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Sylvia Hanika vs Manuela Maleeva Fragniere H2H: 0-4
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere holds a 4–0 lead over Sylvia Hanika in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Manuela Maleeva Fragniere won the 1988 Wichita final 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 66
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1988* | Wichita | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 7-6 7-5 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1987* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 1-6 6-4 6-1 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| May 23, 1986* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-1 6-3 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
| May 24, 1985* | Lugano | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | 6-1 7-6 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | #223 | #6 | 48 | 2,137 | 414 | 238 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | #5 | #3 | 148 | 2,128 | 458 | 183 | 71.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 19 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sylvia Hanika | Manuela Maleeva Fragniere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | — | 1,788 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 50–16 | 75.8% | #6 | 2,098 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #7 | 2,073 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,945 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,111 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 42–14 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,091 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 7 | 1989 | 34–13 | 72.3% | #9 | 2,016 | 0 | 12 |
| 23 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | — | 1,966 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #9 | 2,067 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,878 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 43–14 | 75.4% | #10 | 2,027 | 0 | 15 |
| 25 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #19 | 1,859 | 0 | 8 | 1992 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,994 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,790 | 0 | 9 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,045 | 0 | 18 |
| 27 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 12–2 | 85.7% | #5 | 2,066 | 0 | 19 |
| 28 | 1988 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,918 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,807 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,703 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |