H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Sylvia Hanika vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 0-1

Nicole Bradtke holds a 1–0 lead over Sylvia Hanika in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Bradtke leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1988 Roland Garros round of 16 7-6(1) 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sylvia Hanika
GER Age 66 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Bradtke #53 7-6(1) 7-6(4) Sylvia Hanika #14 Match data May 31, 1988* R16 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sylvia Hanika #223 #5 48 2,135 415 239 63.5% 0 0 1 0 8 9
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,866 182 164 52.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sylvia Hanika Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,533 0 0 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1977 5–3 62.5% — 1,583 0 0 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,599 0 0
18 1978 27–14 65.9% — 1,818 0 1 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,739 0 0
19 1979 26–16 61.9% — 1,949 0 3 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1980 40–22 64.5% — 2,000 0 4 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1981 61–23 72.6% #6 2,082 0 6 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1982 41–23 64.1% #10 1,944 0 7 1992 22–18 55.0% #47 1,710 0 1
23 1983 47–22 68.1% #5 1,969 0 7 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,756 0 2
24 1984 29–20 59.2% #17 1,879 0 8 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,704 0 2
25 1985 22–16 57.9% #19 1,868 0 8 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,785 0 3
26 1986 14–14 50.0% #50 1,803 0 9 1996 6–11 35.3% #94 1,708 0 3
27 1987 32–19 62.7% #14 1,920 0 9 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,696 0 3
28 1988 44–22 66.7% #17 1,919 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1989 18–14 56.2% #41 1,806 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1990 7–10 41.2% #123 1,702 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sylvia Hanika Nicole Bradtke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1986 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1977 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% 1988 10 9 19 52.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
19 1979 5 5 10 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1989 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 1990 10 11 21 47.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1981 15 6 21 71.4% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 26 10 36 72.2% 1991 14 10 24 58.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4% 1992 13 8 21 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 28 12 40 70.0% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1984 10 6 16 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1995 13 9 22 59.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 60 159 62.3% 129 64 193 66.8% 38 32 70 54.3% 144 80 224 64.3% — 106 83 189 56.1% 48 44 92 52.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sylvia Hanika Nicole Bradtke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1508 116.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.25
16 1976 1533 101.8 — — — — +88 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 1–1 — +0.64 1986 1548 101.9 — — — — +44 -8 — 53.8% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +2.05
17 1977 1583 118.4 — — — — +76 -23 — 55.6% +1.28 2–0 1–1 — +1.08 1987 1599 120.5 — — — — +20 -1 -62 44.3% -0.33 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +1.69
18 1978 1818 145.7 — — — — -59 -184 -96 62.6% +1.14 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.8 +0.92 1988 1739 135.8 — — — — -93 +65 -219 57.3% +0.23 7–7 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 -0.02
19 1979 1950 158.1 — — — — -89 -104 -186 57.9% +0.65 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 106.5 -2.88 1989 1711 134.8 — — — — -34 +69 -153 48.7% -0.16 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 +0.32
20 1980 2000 158.9 — — — — +10 -66 -216 61.3% +0.93 11–4 (73%) 4–5 (44%) 105.0 -5.90 1990 1758 145.1 — — — — -31 +44 -163 52.6% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 -2.63
21 1981 2083 166.3 — — — — -7 +24 — 68.4% +1.72 12–7 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.1 -8.48 1991 1760 142.2 — — — — +22 -3 -161 50.5% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) 98.9 -2.07
22 1982 1945 156.9 — — — — +135 +62 -221 64.4% +1.18 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 94.4 -3.08 1992 1710 137.2 — — — — +42 -8 -96 57.0% +0.69 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 92.0 +0.67
23 1983 1970 162.8 — — — — +80 +36 -190 63.4% +1.12 17–8 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 -1.00 1993 1756 140.3 — — — — +73 -52 -113 62.8% +1.01 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 +0.27
24 1984 1880 145.1 — — — — +102 +49 -140 58.5% +0.42 10–4 (71%) 5–0 (100%) 105.7 -0.52 1994 1705 114.0 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
25 1985 1868 147.4 — — — — +26 +92 — 59.5% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 99.7 -2.48 1995 1786 146.5 — — — — -12 -47 -117 57.1% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.7 -2.62
26 1986 1804 136.2 — — — — +8 +158 -100 51.6% -0.02 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.6 -0.61 1996 1709 125.5 — — — — +33 -3 — 43.2% -0.81 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 94.7 -0.45
27 1987 1921 155.2 — — — — +18 +1 -154 62.2% +0.91 7–10 (41%) 3–5 (38%) 96.6 -1.68 1997 1696 110.1 — — — — +26 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — -0.02
28 1988 1919 153.3 — — — — +53 +15 -189 61.6% +0.85 14–5 (74%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 -1.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1989 1806 132.5 — — — — +30 +122 — 52.9% +0.26 9–1 (90%) 4–4 (50%) 103.4 +0.61 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1990 1703 116.6 — — — — +42 +152 — 50.0% -0.35 2–6 (25%) — — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2136 159.8 — — — — +38 +22 -162 61.2% +0.90 114–67 (63%) 50–53 (49%) 100.1 -3.69 — 1866 143.1 — — — — +7 +12 -133 52.8% +0.22 52–57 (48%) 38–42 (48%) 97.9 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.