H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC
Sylvia Hanika vs Regina Marsikova: 5–3 excluding walkovers; 6–3 including 1 walkover. Across 9 main-draw results including walkovers, Sylvia Hanika leads 4–0 on clay, while Regina Marsikova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Regina Marsikova won the 1981 Mahwah round of 16 7-5 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regina Marsikova | 7-5 1-6 6-3 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data | Aug 28, 1981* | R16 | Mahwah | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Sylvia Hanika | 6-1 5-7 11-9 | Regina Marsikova | Match data | Jul 25, 1981* | SF | Monaco | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Sylvia Hanika | (w/o) | Regina Marsikova | Match data | Jul 18, 1981* | SF | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Sylvia Hanika | 6-1 6-3 | Regina Marsikova | Match data | Jun 2, 1981* | R16 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
| Sylvia Hanika | 6-3 6-3 | Regina Marsikova | Match data | Aug 22, 1980* | R16 | Mahwah | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Sylvia Hanika | 6-2 6-4 | Regina Marsikova | Match data | Jul 28, 1979* | SF | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | Clay |
| Regina Marsikova | 5-7 7-6(2) 6-1 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data | Mar 15, 1979* | R32 | Orlando | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Regina Marsikova | 6-2 6-1 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data | Nov 26, 1978* | F | Christchurch | WTA 250 | Grass |
| Sylvia Hanika | 2-6 6-3 6-3 | Regina Marsikova | Match data | Jul 29, 1978* | SF | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | — |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | — | #5 | 48 | 2,137 | 415 | 239 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,036 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 15 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sylvia Hanika | Regina Marsikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,950 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,953 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 2,003 | 0 | 4 | 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,938 | 0 | 12 |
| 21 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | #6 | 2,085 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,902 | 0 | 14 |
| 22 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 1,946 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,998 | 0 | 15 |
| 23 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,880 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,764 | 0 | 15 |
| 27 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,919 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1988 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,919 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,806 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,702 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Sylvia Hanika | Regina Marsikova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1976 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1975 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 17 | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1976 | — | — | — | — | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% |
| 18 | 1978 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 1977 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 25 | 5 | 30 | 83.3% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% |
| 19 | 1979 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 1978 | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | 21 | 4 | 25 | 84.0% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% |
| 20 | 1980 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1979 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 21 | 1981 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 26 | 10 | 36 | 72.2% | 1980 | 15 | 7 | 22 | 68.2% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% |
| 22 | 1982 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% | 1981 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 25 | 9 | 34 | 73.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 23 | 1983 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 28 | 12 | 40 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1985 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1987 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1986 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 28 | 1988 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1987 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | 1989 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1988 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1990 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 99 | 60 | 159 | 62.3% | 129 | 64 | 193 | 66.8% | 38 | 32 | 70 | 54.3% | 144 | 80 | 224 | 64.3% | — | 65 | 49 | 114 | 57.0% | 144 | 74 | 218 | 66.1% | 32 | 28 | 60 | 53.3% | 24 | 46 | 70 | 34.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sylvia Hanika | Regina Marsikova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1500 | 116.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.30 |
| 16 | 1976 | 1533 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | +88 | — | — | 66.7% | +0.50 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.64 | 1975 | 1582 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | +75 | +3 | — | 50.0% | +0.04 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–0 | — | 0.00 |
| 17 | 1977 | 1584 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +75 | -25 | — | 55.6% | +1.28 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +1.84 | 1976 | 1748 | 142.5 | — | — | — | — | -178 | +62 | -175 | 51.3% | +0.34 | 7–7 (50%) | 1–8 (11%) | 97.4 | -1.71 |
| 18 | 1978 | 1817 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | -62 | -183 | -96 | 62.6% | +1.14 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 105.8 | +0.65 | 1977 | 1908 | 143.3 | — | — | — | — | -346 | +115 | -246 | 62.5% | +0.85 | 14–6 (70%) | 5–4 (56%) | 108.7 | +0.40 |
| 19 | 1979 | 1951 | 158.3 | — | — | — | — | -90 | -104 | -188 | 57.9% | +0.65 | 8–5 (62%) | 4–5 (44%) | 106.6 | -2.46 | 1978 | 1953 | 158.0 | — | — | — | — | -97 | +117 | -135 | 64.0% | +0.95 | 12–9 (57%) | 8–6 (57%) | 108.6 | -6.67 |
| 20 | 1980 | 2003 | 159.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -68 | -218 | 61.3% | +0.93 | 11–4 (73%) | 4–5 (44%) | 105.0 | -6.31 | 1979 | 1938 | 147.7 | — | — | — | — | -80 | +153 | -92 | 60.4% | +0.53 | 11–8 (58%) | 12–8 (60%) | 103.7 | -2.57 |
| 21 | 1981 | 2085 | 166.5 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +24 | — | 68.4% | +1.72 | 12–7 (63%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.1 | -8.73 | 1980 | 1902 | 147.9 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +194 | — | 56.1% | +0.38 | 8–6 (57%) | 6–4 (60%) | 100.5 | -6.24 |
| 22 | 1982 | 1946 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | +137 | +62 | -221 | 64.4% | +1.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–8 (33%) | 94.3 | -1.96 | 1981 | 1999 | 159.4 | — | — | — | — | -116 | +183 | — | 63.3% | +0.90 | 10–3 (77%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.0 | -5.46 |
| 23 | 1983 | 1971 | 163.0 | — | — | — | — | +82 | +36 | -191 | 63.4% | +1.12 | 17–8 (68%) | 6–8 (43%) | 100.3 | -1.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1984 | 1880 | 145.2 | — | — | — | — | +103 | +50 | -140 | 58.5% | +0.42 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–0 (100%) | 105.7 | -0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1985 | 1868 | 147.5 | — | — | — | — | +28 | +92 | — | 59.5% | +0.67 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–3 (63%) | 99.6 | -2.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1986 | 1804 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +158 | -98 | 51.6% | -0.02 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.6 | -0.59 | 1985 | 1765 | 131.6 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +293 | -79 | 49.2% | -0.07 | 0–5 (0%) | 6–2 (75%) | 94.5 | -2.24 |
| 27 | 1987 | 1920 | 155.2 | — | — | — | — | +18 | +3 | -153 | 62.2% | +0.91 | 7–10 (41%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.5 | -1.48 | 1986 | 1720 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +191 | — | 41.8% | -0.58 | 8–3 (73%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.4 | -2.14 |
| 28 | 1988 | 1919 | 153.4 | — | — | — | — | +53 | +15 | -188 | 61.6% | +0.85 | 14–5 (74%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.8 | -1.02 | 1987 | 1673 | 129.0 | — | — | — | — | +35 | +91 | -19 | 46.1% | -0.37 | 5–7 (42%) | 4–5 (44%) | 95.0 | -2.64 |
| 29 | 1989 | 1806 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +29 | +122 | — | 52.9% | +0.26 | 9–1 (90%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.4 | +0.41 | 1988 | 1606 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +86 | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 2–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.61 |
| 30 | 1990 | 1703 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | +42 | +152 | — | 50.0% | -0.35 | 2–6 (25%) | — | — | +0.81 | 1989 | 1541 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +71 | — | 14.3% | -2.21 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.26 |
| Career | — | 2138 | 160.0 | — | — | — | — | +39 | +22 | -162 | 61.2% | +0.90 | 114–67 (63%) | 50–53 (49%) | 100.0 | -3.45 | — | 2036 | 150.6 | — | — | — | — | -67 | +139 | -142 | 55.7% | +0.35 | 80–57 (58%) | 50–42 (54%) | 107.3 | -6.31 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | 7 | 11 | 18 | Mar 28, 1987 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 2 | 15 | 17 | Oct 15, 1988 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 2 | 14 | 16 | Aug 19, 1988 | H2H |
| Andrea Jaeger | 2 | 10 | 12 | Jan 8, 1983 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 3 | 8 | 11 | Nov 14, 1988 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chris Evert | 0 | 14 | 14 | Oct 15, 1987 | H2H |
| Mima Jausovec | 4 | 7 | 11 | May 23, 1981 | H2H |
| Evonne Goolagong | 3 | 8 | 11 | Aug 9, 1980 | H2H |
| Virginia Ruzici | 4 | 5 | 9 | Aug 23, 1985 | H2H |
| Sylvia Hanika | 3 | 6 | 9 | Aug 28, 1981 | H2H |