H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Fang Li H2H: 1-2
Fang Li holds a 2–1 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Fang Li leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1998 Pattaya quarterfinal 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
THA
Age 49
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 1998* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Fang Li | 7-6 6-4 | Tamarine Tanasugarn | Match data |
| Feb 6, 1998* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Fang Li | 6-1 6-3 | Tamarine Tanasugarn | Match data |
| Jan 8, 1998* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Tamarine Tanasugarn | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | #947 | #19 | 1,508 | 1,818 | 267 | 273 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #227 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #213 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #75 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #47 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #71 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #29 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #28 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #122 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #72 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #101 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #62 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #94 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,594 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #855 | 1,577 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |