H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Florencia Labat H2H: 0-1

Florencia Labat holds a 1–0 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Florencia Labat leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Florencia Labat won the 1998 Amelia Island round of 64 6-4 6-2.

THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
ARG Age 55 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Florencia Labat #36 6-4 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #38 Match data Apr 8, 1998* R64 Amelia Island Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Florencia Labat #106 #26 733 1,867 191 184 50.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Florencia Labat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,482 0 0
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0 1989 8–8 50.0% #77 1,546 0 0
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0 1990 12–18 40.0% #100 1,572 0 0
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0 1991 19–17 52.8% #60 1,671 0 0
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0 1992 18–17 51.4% #52 1,729 0 0
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0 1993 21–16 56.8% #51 1,762 0 0
23 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0 1994 27–15 64.3% #38 1,787 0 0
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0 1995 16–13 55.2% #55 1,780 0 0
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 1996 25–18 58.1% #42 1,771 0 0
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 1997 21–25 45.7% #39 1,674 0 0
27 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1 1998 13–20 39.4% #64 1,655 0 0
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1 1999 3–6 33.3% #117 1,620 0 0
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1 2000 8–10 44.4% #106 1,609 0 0
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Florencia Labat
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
16 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1994 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1995 2 5 7 28.6% 1989 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1996 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 4 6 10 40.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 8 7 15 53.3% 11 10 21 52.4%
21 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 9 5 14 64.3% 8 10 18 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 14 9 23 60.9% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 24 12 36 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1995 11 8 19 57.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1996 19 11 30 63.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 10 10 20 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
27 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 8 7 15 53.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
28 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 2006 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 2 5 7 28.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6%
32 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
33 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
34 2011 3 9 12 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
38 2015 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 106 84 190 55.8% 66 73 139 47.5% 12 12 24 50.0% 7 15 22 31.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Florencia Labat
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1483 97.1 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.18
16 1993 1483 96.2 0.0% -1.50 0–1 +0.17
17 1994 1493 103.5 50.0% -0.83 1–1 +0.06
18 1995 1479 101.3 +23 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28 1989 1546 110.9 +37 +1 47.4% -0.61 4–2 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 105.8 +1.52
19 1996 1610 124.2 +2 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) +0.66 1990 1573 118.7 +20 -15 42.5% -0.55 6–7 (46%) 6–2 (75%) 104.5 +1.08
20 1997 1648 125.4 -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65 1991 1671 134.2 -10 -1 48.8% -0.15 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 106.9 -0.64
21 1998 1702 138.7 +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91 1992 1730 132.2 +20 -68 50.6% +0.11 6–7 (46%) 0–1 +0.14
22 1999 1634 113.0 -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52 1993 1762 141.4 -20 +7 -160 56.0% +0.68 5–5 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.9 -1.64
23 2000 1792 139.5 -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30 1994 1788 139.9 -25 -123 58.3% +0.54 10–4 (71%) 4–4 (50%) 106.0 -0.06
24 2001 1698 135.6 +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28 1995 1781 133.7 -26 +8 50.8% +0.17 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) -0.32
25 2002 1677 130.8 +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48 1996 1772 142.8 +32 -66 -49 57.0% +0.70 9–7 (56%) 4–4 (50%) 98.7 +0.20
26 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78 1997 1675 134.1 +5 +54 +73 48.1% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–4 (60%) 96.2 +1.02
27 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55 1998 1656 126.6 +51 -6 +31 40.8% -0.83 5–5 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.2 +0.12
28 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.91 1999 1620 118.4 +82 -10 35.0% -1.25 1–1 -0.60
29 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99 2000 1609 110.7 +27 +28 45.2% -0.74 3–3 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 102.8 +0.45
30 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05
31 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05
32 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13
33 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 28.6% -1.57 -0.69
35 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 -0.01
38 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% 0.0% -3.50 0–1 +0.05
Career 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57 1868 138.5 +9 -5 -37 49.9% -0.02 67–55 (55%) 38–29 (57%) 106.9 +0.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.