H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 1–0 lead over Jane Taylor in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 1997 Australian Open round of 64 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 6-4 6-3 | Jane Taylor | Match data | Jan 17, 1997* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | #947 | #19 | 1,508 | 1,825 | 268 | 276 | 49.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jane Taylor | — | — | — | 1,500 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamarine Tanasugarn | Jane Taylor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #227 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #213 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #47 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #71 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #29 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #28 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #66 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #122 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #72 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #37 | 1,684 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #101 | 1,645 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #62 | 1,732 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #94 | 1,648 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,595 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #855 | 1,577 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tamarine Tanasugarn | Jane Taylor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1994 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 19 | 12 | 31 | 61.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 18 | 15 | 33 | 54.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 24 | 16 | 40 | 60.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 21 | 16 | 37 | 56.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 13 | 18 | 31 | 41.9% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 12 | 5 | 17 | 70.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 183 | 185 | 368 | 49.7% | 12 | 47 | 59 | 20.3% | 67 | 37 | 104 | 64.4% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | — | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tamarine Tanasugarn | Jane Taylor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1993 | 1483 | 96.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.17 | 1989 | 1485 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.17 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1493 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.83 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1479 | 101.3 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 29.4% | -1.53 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 100.8 | +0.28 | 1991 | 1469 | 93.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.20 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1610 | 124.2 | — | — | — | — | +2 | — | — | 64.3% | +1.21 | 0–2 | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1648 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -102 | +9 | 48.3% | -0.34 | 5–6 (45%) | 3–2 (60%) | 100.9 | +1.65 | 1993 | 1462 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1702 | 138.7 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -199 | +25 | 48.9% | -0.10 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.1 | +1.91 | 1994 | 1476 | 106.9 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.08 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.43 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1634 | 113.0 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -165 | +110 | 40.8% | -0.57 | 3–4 (43%) | 3–2 (60%) | 99.4 | +0.52 | 1995 | 1462 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.20 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1792 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | -52 | -296 | +110 | 59.5% | +0.54 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–7 (46%) | 102.9 | -1.30 | 1996 | 1459 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.11 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1698 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -272 | +291 | 51.5% | +0.09 | 8–9 (47%) | 7–6 (54%) | 97.5 | +2.28 | 1997 | 1454 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.44 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1677 | 130.8 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -232 | +254 | 52.5% | +0.01 | 15–10 (60%) | 7–6 (54%) | 101.9 | +2.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 1695 | 137.1 | +0.58 | -0.37 | 0.961 | 48.9% | +45 | -272 | +201 | 54.7% | +0.32 | 7–8 (47%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.4 | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 1610 | 121.0 | -2.76 | -1.27 | 0.751 | 43.8% | -13 | -221 | +320 | 45.7% | -0.05 | 2–8 (20%) | 3–4 (43%) | 92.4 | +1.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 1497 | 98.5 | -0.83 | +0.77 | 1.037 | 50.9% | -9 | -166 | +399 | 30.6% | -1.35 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–2 | — | +0.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 1585 | 113.8 | -0.78 | -1.37 | 0.927 | 47.9% | -34 | — | +318 | 52.8% | +0.56 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.4 | +0.99 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 1569 | 117.4 | -2.84 | -1.65 | 0.822 | 45.7% | 0 | -212 | — | 29.8% | -1.54 | 4–3 (57%) | 2–1 (67%) | 103.0 | -2.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 1684 | 130.6 | +1.07 | -0.63 | 0.987 | 49.9% | -102 | — | +348 | 53.2% | -0.05 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–1 (83%) | 104.5 | -1.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 1646 | 112.2 | -0.30 | -0.53 | 0.953 | 49.0% | -110 | -287 | +344 | 46.9% | -0.18 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.3 | -0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 1732 | 129.8 | +0.24 | +3.07 | 1.101 | 52.2% | -26 | — | +172 | 55.8% | +0.65 | 5–1 (83%) | 2–2 (50%) | 104.9 | -0.51 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 1648 | 112.1 | -1.46 | -2.12 | 0.832 | 45.7% | -16 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | — | — | — | -0.69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2012 | 1595 | 100.2 | -3.00 | -1.41 | 0.812 | 45.8% | +29 | — | — | 31.8% | -1.59 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2015 | 1577 | 97.4 | -0.66 | -2.32 | 0.578 | 38.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1825 | 132.1 | -0.71 | -0.34 | 0.932 | 48.5% | -6 | -214 | +226 | 48.6% | -0.13 | 77–74 (51%) | 52–55 (49%) | 98.6 | +1.57 | — | 1500 | 97.5 | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | — | 23.3% | -1.83 | 3–1 (75%) | 0–3 (0%) | 100.4 | +10.31 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venus Williams | 0 | 7 | 7 | Jul 3, 2008 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 2 | 4 | 6 | Feb 21, 2008 | H2H |
| Nicole Pratt | 3 | 3 | 6 | Mar 24, 2005 | H2H |
| Jill Craybas | 4 | 2 | 6 | Oct 8, 2004 | H2H |
| Magdalena Maleeva | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jun 11, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liza Andriyani | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 25, 1997 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 17, 1997 | H2H |
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | 1 | 0 | 1 | Jan 15, 1997 | H2H |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 17, 1996 | H2H |
| Silke Meier | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jan 18, 1995 | H2H |