H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Laura Golarsa H2H: 2-2

Tamarine Tanasugarn and Laura Golarsa are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Laura Golarsa leads 2–0 on grass, while Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Golarsa won the 1998 Birmingham third round 4-6 7-5 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Laura Golarsa
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 11, 1998* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Laura Golarsa #79 4-6 7-5 6-0 Tamarine Tanasugarn #41 Match data
Jun 12, 1997* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Laura Golarsa #113 6-3 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #48 Match data
Jan 3, 1997* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #75 6-2 6-3 Laura Golarsa #145 Match data
Jan 4, 1995* Jakarta WTA 250 R64 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #226 4-6 7-6 6-3 Laura Golarsa #111 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Laura Golarsa #693 #39 436 1,761 127 180 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Laura Golarsa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0 1985 5–1 83.3% #166 1,563 0 1
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0 1986 5–5 50.0% #167 1,593 0 1
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0 1987 6–10 37.5% #121 1,575 0 1
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0 1988 11–14 44.0% #79 1,619 0 1
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0 1989 22–18 55.0% #58 1,706 0 1
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0 1990 14–16 46.7% #61 1,689 0 1
23 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0 1991 3–13 18.8% #213 1,546 0 1
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0 1992 5–10 33.3% #125 1,522 0 1
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 1993 17–18 48.6% #69 1,637 0 1
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 1994 13–22 37.1% #112 1,582 0 1
27 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1 1995 5–10 33.3% #149 1,551 0 1
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1 1996 1–8 11.1% #145 1,468 0 1
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1 1997 7–9 43.8% #62 1,532 0 1
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1 1998 10–16 38.5% #94 1,570 0 1
31 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2 1999 3–10 23.1% #168 1,513 0 1
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4 — — — — — — —