H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Laura Granville H2H: 1-3

Laura Granville holds a 3–1 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Laura Granville leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2007 San Diego round of 64 6-4 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Laura Granville
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamarine Tanasugarn #85 6-4 5-7 6-4 Laura Granville #57 Match data Aug 1, 2007* R64 San Diego Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Laura Granville #100 6-4 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #64 Match data Jun 11, 2005* QF Birmingham Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Laura Granville #54 4-6 6-3 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #53 Match data Mar 9, 2004* R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Laura Granville #54 6-1 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #35 Match data Jan 21, 2004* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Laura Granville #466 #28 1,063 1,699 86 108 44.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Laura Granville
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0 1998 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #841 1,501 0 0
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0 2001 0–3 0.0% #220 1,485 0 0
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0 2002 11–10 52.4% #49 1,637 0 0
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0 2003 22–22 50.0% #46 1,652 0 0
23 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0 2004 17–19 47.2% #74 1,600 0 0
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0 2005 12–15 44.4% #60 1,613 0 0
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 2006 12–16 42.9% #68 1,588 0 0
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 2007 11–15 42.3% #61 1,612 0 0
27 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1 2008 0–2 0.0% #379 1,593 0 0
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1 2009 0–2 0.0% #293 1,565 0 0
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1 2010 0–2 0.0% #448 1,541 0 0
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Laura Granville
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2003 11 13 24 45.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
23 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2004 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2005 7 13 20 35.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
25 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 8 9 17 47.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2009 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2% — 60 75 135 44.4% 6 19 25 24.0% 15 11 26 57.7% 5 3 8 62.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's and 71/167 of Laura Granville's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Laura Granville
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 8/44 1.4 2.8 61.8% 60.8% 50.1% 51.8% 41.7% 56.7% 47.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 5/36 1.0 2.4 61.3% 58.6% 50.7% 61.2% 54.8% 55.6% 42.0%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/27 1.1 1.6 65.1% 64.3% 53.0% 50.2% 56.4% 60.4% 39.3%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 20/28 1.7 2.6 63.3% 64.3% 46.6% 60.2% 45.3% 58.0% 42.2%
26 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0% 2007 23/26 1.8 2.3 67.0% 59.8% 46.1% 58.3% 50.4% 55.3% 40.4%
27 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9% 2008 2/2 3.0 1.0 73.1% 51.1% 42.9% 43.7% 22.5% 48.9% 30.0%
28 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0% 2009 2/2 1.5 1.5 56.1% 54.9% 44.4% 29.2% 0.0% 50.3% 29.9%
29 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7% 2010 2/2 2.0 1.0 58.9% 64.5% 48.8% 33.3% 25.0% 58.0% 30.4%
30 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Laura Granville
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06 1998 1512 104.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.12
18 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28 1999 1501 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.04
19 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65 2001 1486 117.9 — — — — +27 — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 — — -0.28
21 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91 2002 1638 133.0 — — — — -22 — +41 47.8% +0.09 4–0 (100%) 1–5 (17%) 103.7 -0.79
22 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52 2003 1652 130.1 +0.38 +1.61 1.093 51.8% -4 -93 +67 51.9% +0.13 6–10 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.7 +0.59
23 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30 2004 1600 113.5 -0.02 -1.05 0.945 48.6% +45 -119 — 46.3% -0.39 5–5 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 +1.57
24 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28 2005 1613 122.6 +2.34 -2.15 0.993 50.2% -27 — +133 46.8% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.60
25 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48 2006 1589 119.7 +1.32 -1.98 1.003 50.3% +21 -140 +111 43.5% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 98.4 +0.28
26 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78 2007 1612 125.6 +0.15 -1.84 0.904 48.0% +10 -209 +140 44.1% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 -1.20
27 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55 2008 1593 108.1 -0.86 -1.03 0.587 40.2% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.41
28 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91 2009 1565 93.8 -0.31 -3.03 0.603 39.1% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — 0–1 — -0.04
29 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99 2010 1542 100.5 -0.89 -3.05 0.723 43.7% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
30 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57 — 1699 128.3 +0.70 -1.52 0.940 48.8% +7 -125 +103 45.4% -0.33 24–28 (46%) 15–18 (45%) 97.7 -0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.