H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 3-0

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 3–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2010 Birmingham round of 64 6-2 6-2.

THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 0
3 main-draw meetings
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamarine Tanasugarn #72 6-2 6-2 Lilia Osterloh #130 Match data Jun 9, 2010* R64 Birmingham International modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Tamarine Tanasugarn #30 6-4 6-4 Lilia Osterloh #53 Match data Jan 11, 2002* SF Canberra Tier V modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tamarine Tanasugarn #37 6-3 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #47 Match data Oct 13, 2000* R16 Japan Women's Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1994 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1995 2 5 7 28.6% 1996 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1996 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 4 5 9 44.4%
27 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2006 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2006 7 6 13 53.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0%
31 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 2009 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
34 2011 3 9 12 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
35 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
38 2015 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's and 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Lilia Osterloh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0% —/—
27 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9% 2005 3/11 0.3 4.3 60.5% 46.3% 46.2% 38.9% 66.7% 46.9% 37.3%
28 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0% 2006 7/14 0.9 3.6 66.1% 56.0% 39.1% 42.7% 47.9% 49.6% 46.1%
29 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7% 2007 17/19 1.8 3.6 60.1% 54.8% 45.0% 46.6% 44.5% 50.6% 43.6%
30 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6% 2008 12/13 1.3 4.6 58.3% 60.2% 37.4% 55.9% 42.2% 50.7% 42.9%
31 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7% 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 62.8% 60.1% 48.3% 55.1% 59.7% 56.1% 39.6%
32 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6% 2010 7/7 2.9 3.0 61.3% 57.0% 39.1% 47.3% 54.5% 50.0% 37.0%
33 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3% —/—
34 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0% —/—
35 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3% —/—
38 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9% —/—
Career 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0% 52/221 1.7 3.7 61.0% 56.6% 42.1% 48.9% 48.8% 50.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1993 1483 96.2 0.0% -1.50 0–1 +0.17
17 1994 1493 103.5 50.0% -0.83 1–1 +0.06
18 1995 1479 101.3 +23 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28 1996 1519 110.9 50.0% +0.50 -0.06
19 1996 1610 124.2 +2 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) +0.66 1997 1551 112.0 +33 28.6% -2.00 1–0 +0.04
20 1997 1648 125.4 -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65 1998 1502 105.3 +38 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 +0.07
21 1998 1702 138.7 +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91 1999 1546 126.1 +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) -0.06
22 1999 1634 113.0 -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52 2000 1596 120.7 -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 2000 1792 139.5 -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30 2001 1658 133.0 -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 2001 1698 135.6 +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28 2002 1535 110.8 +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 2002 1677 130.8 +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48 2003 1509 94.9 0.0% -2.75 +0.04
26 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78 2004 1561 130.0 +95 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 -0.58
27 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 -0.27
28 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.91 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 -0.55
30 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) +0.06
31 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 +0.33
32 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 -0.29
33 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 28.6% -1.57 -0.69
35 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 -0.01
38 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% 0.0% -3.50 0–1 +0.05
Career 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.