H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 3-0

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 3–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2010 Birmingham second round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 9, 2010* Birmingham WTA 250 R64 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #72 6-2 6-2 Lilia Osterloh #130 Match data
Jan 11, 2002* Canberra WTA 250 SF Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #30 6-4 6-4 Lilia Osterloh #53 Match data
Oct 13, 2000* Japan Open WTA 500 R16 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #37 6-3 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4 — — — — — — —