H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 0-1

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1998 Tokyo fourth round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 17, 1998* Tokyo WTA 500 R16 Hard Lori Mcneil #136 6-2 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4 — — — — — — —