H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Michaella Krajicek H2H: 1-0

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 1–0 lead over Michaella Krajicek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2008 Libéma Open quarterfinal 3-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Michaella Krajicek
The Netherlands Age 37 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamarine Tanasugarn #85 3-6 6-3 6-4 Michaella Krajicek #51 Match data Jun 21, 2008* QF Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn — #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Michaella Krajicek — #30 918 1,802 89 98 47.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Michaella Krajicek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #244 1,471 0 0
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0 2005 14–8 63.6% #63 1,653 0 1
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0 2006 26–16 61.9% #35 1,752 0 3
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0 2007 21–25 45.7% #33 1,673 0 3
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0 2008 3–13 18.8% #203 1,538 0 3
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,648 0 0 2009 4–7 36.4% #128 1,539 0 3
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0 2010 2–5 28.6% #145 1,508 0 3
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0 2011 9–6 60.0% #93 1,590 0 3
23 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0 2012 7–9 43.8% #167 1,563 0 3
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0 2013 1–4 20.0% #282 1,536 0 3
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 2014 1–1 50.0% #273 1,546 0 3
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 2015 1–1 50.0% #178 1,549 0 3
27 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,646 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Michaella Krajicek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 11 5 16 68.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
17 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 14 9 23 60.9% 7 6 13 53.8% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
18 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 14 23 39.1% 7 7 14 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2011 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2014 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2015 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
27 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2% — 52 53 105 49.5% 18 26 44 40.9% 19 18 37 51.4% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's and 134/184 of Michaella Krajicek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Michaella Krajicek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/22 4.4 4.8 58.1% 66.3% 43.8% 49.5% 51.2% 56.2% 43.3%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 17/42 3.8 4.1 60.9% 62.1% 45.9% 59.5% 48.6% 55.8% 35.8%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 39/46 4.5 5.1 59.9% 69.1% 44.6% 54.0% 49.3% 59.2% 44.1%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 16/16 3.5 4.8 60.6% 61.0% 45.5% 39.9% 46.1% 54.8% 37.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 11/11 2.6 5.6 59.8% 65.4% 48.9% 58.8% 39.7% 58.8% 37.8%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 7/7 4.0 5.4 60.9% 61.2% 36.9% 48.0% 53.7% 51.7% 39.3%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 14/15 6.1 4.1 52.7% 76.4% 48.5% 45.5% 36.0% 63.2% 38.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 16/16 5.6 6.9 52.9% 67.5% 45.5% 45.1% 33.8% 57.1% 38.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 5/5 6.0 8.2 51.0% 65.0% 40.1% 47.1% 53.3% 53.1% 38.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 2/2 8.0 2.0 63.2% 74.3% 55.9% 55.0% 52.4% 67.6% 37.9%
26 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0% 2015 2/2 18.5 2.5 67.9% 74.8% 50.7% 65.3% 56.3% 67.0% 23.4%
27 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.8% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0% — 134/187 4.7 5.1 58.3% 67.0% 45.4% 51.1% 45.6% 57.9% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Michaella Krajicek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1490 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.01
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1472 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -3.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
16 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17 2005 1653 123.1 -0.34 -0.48 0.988 50.3% +4 -140 -95 60.0% +0.98 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 +0.45
17 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06 2006 1752 128.7 +0.10 -4.98 0.810 46.4% -10 -161 -31 54.0% +0.30 10–1 (91%) 4–6 (40%) 109.2 -1.86
18 1995 1479 101.4 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28 2007 1674 134.7 +2.45 +0.06 1.081 51.6% -42 -38 +107 46.7% +0.27 7–8 (47%) 3–13 (19%) 92.8 -0.44
19 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66 2008 1538 99.5 -1.35 -4.34 0.823 45.9% +19 -25 +205 27.0% -1.33 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.7 +0.72
20 1997 1648 125.5 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65 2009 1539 115.0 +1.40 -2.80 0.919 48.8% +23 — +166 40.7% -0.74 2–3 (40%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.23
21 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +20 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91 2010 1508 96.4 -2.93 -3.02 0.815 45.9% +33 — — 31.3% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — +0.16
22 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -164 +111 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52 2011 1591 120.3 +2.85 -3.04 1.037 50.4% +34 — — 57.1% +0.40 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.99
23 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.29 2012 1563 112.2 -0.14 -3.52 0.895 47.7% +62 -55 — 44.4% -0.53 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.8 +0.18
24 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28 2013 1537 98.4 -0.64 -2.23 0.809 45.9% — — +54 33.3% -1.33 0–2 0–2 — -0.29
25 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48 2014 1546 103.0 +2.61 -2.09 1.167 52.6% — — — 40.0% +0.80 1–0 0–2 — +0.11
26 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78 2015 1550 102.0 +0.78 -1.05 0.709 47.8% — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.05
27 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91 2017 1530 92.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -33 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99 2018 1512 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1569 117.5 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% -1 -211 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1685 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -104 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1733 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -27 — +171 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1649 112.2 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -17 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01 2024 1503 97.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1578 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.60 — 1803 124.7 +0.82 -2.41 0.938 48.8% +3 -85 +78 47.2% -0.05 35–29 (55%) 24–30 (44%) 100.5 -0.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.