H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-6

Monica Seles holds a 6–0 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Stanford fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 6
6 main draw meetings
Monica Seles
USA Age 52 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 26, 2002* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Monica Seles #4 6-4 3-6 6-1 Tamarine Tanasugarn #27 Match data
Jul 3, 2002* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Monica Seles #4 6-2 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #24 Match data
Feb 17, 2002* Doha WTA 1000 F Hard Monica Seles #7 7-6(6) 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #21 Match data
Oct 7, 2001* Japan Open WTA 250 F Hard Monica Seles #9 6-3 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #29 Match data
Sep 26, 1998* Tokyo WTA 500 SF Hard Monica Seles #6 6-1 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #47 Match data
Sep 19, 1997* Tokyo WTA 500 R16 Hard Monica Seles #3 6-1 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #41 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Monica Seles #223 #1 4,056 2,540 578 121 82.7% 9 12 3 7 22 53

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Monica Seles
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1988 5–3 62.5% #86 1,600 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1989 33–9 78.6% #6 2,002 0 1
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0 1990 55–6 90.2% #2 2,295 1 10
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0 1991 74–6 92.5% #1 2,443 4 20
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0 1992 70–5 93.3% #1 2,499 7 30
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0 1993 17–2 89.5% #8 2,485 8 32
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0 1995 11–1 91.7% #1 2,487 8 33
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0 1996 43–8 84.3% #2 2,342 9 38
23 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0 1997 45–14 76.3% #5 2,159 9 41
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0 1998 42–13 76.4% #6 2,174 9 43
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 1999 36–12 75.0% #6 2,116 9 44
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 2000 51–12 81.0% #4 2,144 9 47
27 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1 2001 40–10 80.0% #10 2,127 9 51
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1 2002 46–13 78.0% #7 2,088 9 53
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1 2003 10–7 58.8% #60 1,993 9 53
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3 — — — — — — —
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4 — — — — — — —