H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 1-3

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 3–1 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 2–1 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 2001 Los Angeles third round 6-3 7-6(1).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 2001* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Nathalie Tauziat #9 6-3 7-6(1) Tamarine Tanasugarn #29 Match data
Jul 4, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Nathalie Tauziat #10 6-3 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #31 Match data
Jun 22, 2001* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #33 6-7(1) 7-6(6) 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #10 Match data
Jun 13, 1996* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Nathalie Tauziat #22 4-6 7-6 6-3 Tamarine Tanasugarn #303 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 546 330 62.3% 0 1 0 1 6 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Nathalie Tauziat
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,845 0 0
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0 1988 30–19 61.2% #26 1,856 0 0
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,881 0 0
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1
23 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,970 0 1
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0 1992 38–19 66.7% #14 1,936 0 1
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,846 0 3
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1 1996 30–21 58.8% #22 1,806 0 3
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,976 0 4
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,024 0 4
31 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,987 0 6
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,868 0 7
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,863 0 8
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4 — — — — — — —