H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Sandrine Testud H2H: 1-3

Sandrine Testud holds a 3–1 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Sandrine Testud leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sandrine Testud won the 2002 Dubai Tennis Championships quarterfinal 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Sandrine Testud
FRA Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandrine Testud #11 6-2 6-0 Tamarine Tanasugarn #20 Match data Feb 23, 2002* QF Dubai Tennis Championships Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Sandrine Testud #14 4-6 7-5 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #72 Match data Jan 23, 2000* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tamarine Tanasugarn #63 6-2 1-6 6-3 Sandrine Testud #16 Match data Jun 27, 1999* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Sandrine Testud #12 3-6 6-1 6-2 Tamarine Tanasugarn #50 Match data Jan 28, 1998* R16 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Sandrine Testud #1,203 #9 2,233 2,003 309 237 56.6% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Sandrine Testud
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0 1990 0–2 0.0% #170 1,484 0 0
19 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0 1991 8–10 44.4% #109 1,549 0 0
20 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0 1992 11–17 39.3% #106 1,568 0 0
21 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0 1993 11–19 36.7% #100 1,561 0 0
22 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0 1994 10–14 41.7% #81 1,604 0 0
23 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0 1995 19–16 54.3% #41 1,736 0 0
24 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0 1996 21–17 55.3% #41 1,774 0 0
25 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0 1997 41–22 65.1% #14 1,920 0 1
26 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1 1998 51–26 66.2% #14 1,945 0 2
27 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1 1999 36–25 59.0% #13 1,900 0 2
28 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1 2000 30–20 60.0% #17 1,917 0 2
29 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1 2001 53–27 66.2% #11 1,977 0 3
30 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1 2002 17–14 54.8% #38 1,846 0 3
31 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2 — — — — — — —
32 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3 2004 1–8 11.1% #313 1,725 0 3
33 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Sandrine Testud
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1991 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 7 9 16 43.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 8 11 19 42.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 1994 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 1996 14 9 23 60.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 20 10 30 66.7% 12 5 17 70.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
26 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 26 12 38 68.4% 16 8 24 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 4 8 50.0%
27 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 20 12 32 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 7 16 56.3%
28 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2000 20 10 30 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2001 39 17 56 69.6% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 5 5 10 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2% — 183 118 301 60.8% 78 66 144 54.2% 19 21 40 47.5% 29 32 61 47.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's and 1/9 of Sandrine Testud's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Sandrine Testud
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6% 2004 1/9 0.0 4.0 64.3% 60.0% 28.0% 61.5% 42.9% 48.6% 41.9%
33 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0% — 1/546 0.0 4.0 64.3% 60.0% 28.0% 61.5% 42.9% 48.6% 41.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tamarine Tanasugarn Sandrine Testud
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.28 1990 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.16
19 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66 1991 1550 115.1 — — — — +5 -2 — 47.6% +0.14 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.80
20 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.65 1992 1568 120.4 — — — — +2 -13 -14 42.2% -0.63 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.18
21 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.91 1993 1561 126.2 — — — — +20 -9 — 39.7% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.09
22 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.52 1994 1605 130.9 — — — — +19 -44 — 45.3% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.24
23 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) — -1.30 1995 1737 138.2 — — — — +1 -140 — 55.1% +0.24 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.86
24 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) — +2.28 1996 1774 140.4 — — — — -7 -110 -241 54.7% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.01
25 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) — +2.48 1997 1921 159.0 — — — — -23 -105 -290 60.1% +0.67 13–6 (68%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.03
26 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.78 1998 1945 158.8 — — — — -9 -36 -184 63.6% +1.08 19–10 (66%) 10–10 (50%) — +1.78
27 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.55 1999 1901 157.5 — — — — +27 -33 -217 56.7% +0.48 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) — +2.23
28 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91 2000 1918 163.3 — — — — +69 -103 -240 56.6% +0.65 13–9 (59%) 7–6 (54%) — -2.28
29 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.99 2001 1978 158.2 — — — — +16 -130 -244 62.3% +0.97 14–9 (61%) 10–13 (43%) — -3.00
30 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) — -2.05 2002 1846 144.7 — — — — +107 +12 -165 52.0% +0.39 8–5 (62%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.55
31 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) — -1.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.13 2004 1726 120.4 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +166 +41 — 26.3% -1.58 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.36
33 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57 — 2004 155.8 -1.08 -0.06 0.815 45.5% +17 -60 -202 55.2% +0.45 98–79 (55%) 64–61 (51%) 103.8 -0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.