H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tamarine Tanasugarn vs Sung-Hee Park H2H: 0-2
Sung-Hee Park holds a 2–0 lead over Tamarine Tanasugarn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sung-Hee Park leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sung-Hee Park won the 1996 Tokyo third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
THA
Age 49
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 1996* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sung-Hee Park | 7-6 6-2 | Tamarine Tanasugarn | Match data |
| Oct 5, 1995* | Surabaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sung-Hee Park | 7-5 6-1 | Tamarine Tanasugarn | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | #947 | #19 | 1,508 | 1,818 | 267 | 273 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Sung-Hee Park | #599 | #57 | 271 | 1,626 | 29 | 51 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | Sung-Hee Park | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #233 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #227 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #213 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #75 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #101 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #47 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #111 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #37 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #71 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #28 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #29 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 32–26 | 55.2% | #28 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #34 | 1,694 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #66 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #122 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #72 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #37 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #101 | 1,653 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #62 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #94 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #152 | 1,594 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #855 | 1,577 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |