H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Tami Whitlinger Jones vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 1-2
Ginger Helgeson holds a 2–1 lead over Tami Whitlinger Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Ginger Helgeson leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ginger Helgeson won the 1993 Oakland third round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 1993* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Ginger Helgeson | 6-0 6-1 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
| Nov 13, 1992* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Tami Whitlinger Jones | 6-2 6-3 | Ginger Helgeson | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1992* | San Juan | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Ginger Helgeson | 3-6 6-0 7-6 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,786 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ginger Helgeson | #467 | #29 | 246 | 1,865 | 94 | 95 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | Ginger Helgeson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #111 | 1,768 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #167 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #152 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |