H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tami Whitlinger Jones vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 2-2

Tami Whitlinger Jones and Kimberly Po Messerli are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kimberly Po Messerli leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kimberly Po Messerli won the 1997 Oklahoma round of 32 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Kimberly Po Messerli
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kimberly Po Messerli 7-6 6-4 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data Feb 20, 1997* R32 Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tami Whitlinger Jones 1-6 6-4 7-5 Kimberly Po Messerli Match data Oct 26, 1996* QF Canadian Indoor Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Tami Whitlinger Jones 7-6 6-0 Kimberly Po Messerli Match data Jun 28, 1995* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Kimberly Po Messerli 6-1 1-6 6-2 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data Nov 1, 1991* R16 Scottsdale Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,777 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimberly Po Messerli — — — 1,879 118 133 47.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tami Whitlinger Jones Kimberly Po Messerli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1991 5–4 55.6% — 1,568 0 0
20 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0 1992 14–16 46.7% — 1,654 0 0
21 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,576 0 0 1993 20–19 51.3% — 1,776 0 0
22 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0 1994 11–17 39.3% — 1,701 0 0
23 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,644 0 0 1995 4–13 23.5% — 1,609 0 0
24 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,650 0 0 1996 20–13 60.6% — 1,806 0 0
25 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,709 0 0 1997 27–20 57.4% — 1,790 0 0
26 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,700 0 0 1998 11–15 42.3% — 1,743 0 0
27 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,694 0 0 1999 6–13 31.6% — 1,653 0 0
28 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,596 0 0 2000 0–2 0.0% — 1,611 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tami Whitlinger Jones Kimberly Po Messerli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
22 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 3 6 9 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0%
23 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 3 4 7 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1993 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 13 6 19 68.4% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
25 1994 13 12 25 52.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1997 21 13 34 61.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1997 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 63 73 136 46.3% 24 35 59 40.7% 7 12 19 36.8% 12 15 27 44.4% — 72 67 139 51.8% 8 20 28 28.6% 15 19 34 44.1% 23 27 50 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tami Whitlinger Jones Kimberly Po Messerli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1494 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05 1989 1486 97.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.12
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1568 120.4 — — — — +29 — — 56.5% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — -0.01
20 1989 1525 121.7 — — — — +38 — — 52.4% +0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.49 1992 1655 127.7 — — — — -8 — -30 45.6% -0.40 5–5 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 103.5 +0.99
21 1990 1577 126.7 — — — — +71 -98 — 43.9% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–6 (14%) 96.8 +0.78 1993 1777 145.0 — — — — +17 -217 -153 50.0% -0.15 6–4 (60%) 5–2 (71%) 106.5 -0.91
22 1991 1682 133.2 — — — — -51 -22 -78 49.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 8–2 (80%) 106.6 -0.08 1994 1702 128.7 — — — — +38 -143 -106 44.6% -0.51 4–7 (36%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.08
23 1992 1645 120.9 — — — — +15 -10 — 41.0% -0.59 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 -0.65 1995 1610 120.0 — — — — +98 -130 — 29.7% -1.11 0–3 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 93.6 +0.25
24 1993 1651 135.8 — — — — +45 -78 -87 41.7% -0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.7 -1.72 1996 1807 155.2 — — — — +52 — -239 57.5% +0.44 5–4 (56%) 1–1 — +0.41
25 1994 1709 145.5 — — — — +28 — — 45.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -1.10 1997 1790 146.8 — — — — +28 -289 -240 55.0% +0.44 9–8 (53%) 7–2 (78%) 103.7 +1.04
26 1995 1701 136.6 — — — — -14 -37 -134 53.8% +0.30 6–11 (35%) 6–4 (60%) 96.8 -1.16 1998 1743 135.6 — — — — +16 -267 -100 44.8% -0.59 2–4 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 102.7 -0.85
27 1996 1694 132.0 — — — — +28 -56 — 42.3% -0.48 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.18 1999 1653 120.4 — — — — +21 -179 -26 38.1% -1.00 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 93.6 -1.39
28 1997 1596 120.8 — — — — +84 -20 — 25.8% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 -0.98 2000 1611 101.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.00 0–1 0–2 — +0.12
Career — 1778 139.7 — — — — +23 -42 -104 45.0% -0.32 33–44 (43%) 25–32 (44%) 97.2 -1.94 — 1880 144.9 — — — — +29 -197 -111 47.9% -0.22 33–43 (43%) 26–20 (57%) 102.5 -0.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.