H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tami Whitlinger Jones vs Linda Ferrando H2H: 1-2
Linda Ferrando holds a 2–1 lead over Tami Whitlinger Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Linda Ferrando leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Ferrando won the 1994 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 60
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1994* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Linda Ferrando | 6-4 6-1 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
| Feb 20, 1993* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Tami Whitlinger Jones | 6-3 7-6 | Linda Ferrando | Match data |
| Apr 5, 1990* | Hilton Head | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Linda Ferrando | 6-2 6-1 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,786 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Linda Ferrando | #474 | #36 | 42 | 1,734 | 87 | 101 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Linda Ferrando | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #154 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #67 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #44 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #67 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |