H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Tami Whitlinger Jones vs Mana Endo H2H: 0-4
Mana Endo holds a 4–0 lead over Tami Whitlinger Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mana Endo leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mana Endo won the 1996 Hobart third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1996* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Mana Endo | 6-1 6-3 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1995* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Mana Endo | 4-6 6-1 7-5 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mana Endo | 6-4 7-6 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
| Jun 17, 1992* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Mana Endo | 6-3 6-4 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,786 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mana Endo | #381 | #26 | 413 | 1,819 | 77 | 79 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Mana Endo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #47 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #115 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #316 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |