H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Mana Endo holds a 4–0 lead over Tami Whitlinger Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mana Endo leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mana Endo won the 1996 Hobart International round of 32 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mana Endo | 6-1 6-3 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data | Jan 11, 1996* | R32 | Hobart International | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Mana Endo | 4-6 6-1 7-5 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data | Aug 9, 1995* | R64 | Manhattan Beach | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
| Mana Endo | 6-4 7-6 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data | Aug 31, 1994* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Mana Endo | 6-3 6-4 | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Match data | Jun 17, 1992* | R64 | Eastbourne Open | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,777 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mana Endo | #381 | #26 | 413 | 1,820 | 78 | 80 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Mana Endo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #118 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #57 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #47 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #28 | 1,807 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,729 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #115 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #316 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,596 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Mana Endo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1990 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1992 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1991 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1993 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 23 | 1992 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1994 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 24 | 1993 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 52.4% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1995 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1994 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1996 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1995 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1997 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1998 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 63 | 73 | 136 | 46.3% | 24 | 35 | 59 | 40.7% | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | — | 46 | 44 | 90 | 51.1% | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Mana Endo | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1986 | 1494 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1989 | 1525 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.24 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–2 (33%) | 96.3 | +0.49 | 1991 | 1524 | 110.8 | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | — | 39.1% | -0.96 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.74 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1577 | 126.7 | — | — | — | — | +71 | -98 | — | 43.9% | -0.17 | 5–5 (50%) | 1–6 (14%) | 96.8 | +0.78 | 1992 | 1649 | 131.7 | — | — | — | — | -29 | -49 | -32 | 57.4% | +0.68 | 1–3 (25%) | 4–1 (80%) | 99.8 | +1.06 |
| 22 | 1991 | 1682 | 133.2 | — | — | — | — | -51 | -22 | -78 | 49.4% | -0.26 | 6–7 (46%) | 8–2 (80%) | 106.6 | -0.08 | 1993 | 1700 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -25 | -96 | -20 | 52.5% | +0.31 | 5–6 (45%) | 0–4 (0%) | 96.9 | -1.29 |
| 23 | 1992 | 1645 | 120.9 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -10 | — | 41.0% | -0.59 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–3 (40%) | 102.8 | -0.65 | 1994 | 1807 | 145.1 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | -110 | 60.3% | +0.55 | 3–3 (50%) | 4–1 (80%) | 104.5 | -0.50 |
| 24 | 1993 | 1651 | 135.8 | — | — | — | — | +45 | -78 | -87 | 41.7% | -0.75 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | 99.7 | -1.72 | 1995 | 1729 | 126.4 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -167 | -11 | 43.1% | -0.45 | 5–3 (63%) | 5–1 (83%) | 103.3 | -0.83 |
| 25 | 1994 | 1709 | 145.5 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.15 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–5 (17%) | 97.5 | -1.10 | 1996 | 1685 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | +66 | 50.0% | -0.33 | 3–5 (38%) | 2–0 | — | -0.32 |
| 26 | 1995 | 1701 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | -14 | -37 | -134 | 53.8% | +0.30 | 6–11 (35%) | 6–4 (60%) | 96.8 | -1.16 | 1997 | 1591 | 112.4 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 41.0% | -0.49 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | 94.8 | +0.38 |
| 27 | 1996 | 1694 | 132.0 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -56 | — | 42.3% | -0.48 | 4–2 (67%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.6 | -0.18 | 1998 | 1562 | 95.6 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 30.0% | -0.80 | 1–1 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +0.22 |
| 28 | 1997 | 1596 | 120.8 | — | — | — | — | +84 | -20 | — | 25.8% | -1.55 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–3 (0%) | 93.1 | -0.98 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1778 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -42 | -104 | 45.0% | -0.32 | 33–44 (43%) | 25–32 (44%) | 97.2 | -1.94 | — | 1820 | 135.7 | — | — | — | — | +14 | -100 | -29 | 49.9% | -0.02 | 21–26 (45%) | 17–12 (59%) | 101.2 | -0.34 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy Frazier | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 29, 1996 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jan 21, 1996 | H2H |
| Ann Grossman | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jun 30, 1995 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 6 | 6 | Jan 20, 1995 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 25, 1997 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naoko Sawamatsu | 1 | 4 | 5 | Sep 19, 1997 | H2H |
| Kimiko Date | 2 | 3 | 5 | Jan 19, 1996 | H2H |
| Kristine Kunce | 4 | 0 | 4 | Apr 16, 1998 | H2H |
| Natasha Zvereva | 1 | 3 | 4 | Mar 12, 1997 | H2H |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 11, 1996 | H2H |