H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Tami Whitlinger Jones vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 0-1

Meredith Mcgrath holds a 1–0 lead over Tami Whitlinger Jones in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Meredith Mcgrath leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meredith Mcgrath won the 1996 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Meredith Mcgrath
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meredith Mcgrath #50 6-1 7-5 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data Mar 22, 1996* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,777 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meredith Mcgrath #315 #18 898 1,927 90 84 51.7% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tami Whitlinger Jones Meredith Mcgrath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #400 1,497 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–10 37.5% #93 1,516 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 15–12 55.6% #28 1,708 0 0
20 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0 1991 4–6 40.0% #164 1,679 0 0
21 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,576 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #780 1,657 0 0
22 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0 1993 12–12 50.0% #66 1,707 0 0
23 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,644 0 0 1994 22–16 57.9% #39 1,767 0 2
24 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,650 0 0 1995 11–15 42.3% #62 1,742 0 2
25 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,709 0 0 1996 19–9 67.9% #26 1,917 0 3
26 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,700 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,694 0 0 1998 1–2 33.3% #318 1,895 0 3
28 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,596 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tami Whitlinger Jones Meredith Mcgrath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1989 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 1993 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 2 7 9 22.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
25 1994 13 12 25 52.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1996 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1997 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 73 136 46.3% 24 35 59 40.7% 7 12 19 36.8% 12 15 27 44.4% — 36 43 79 45.6% 8 11 19 42.1% 29 15 44 65.9% 17 15 32 53.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tami Whitlinger Jones Meredith Mcgrath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1494 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05 1988 1497 107.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1517 113.0 — — — — +50 — +23 34.4% -0.91 1–1 0–1 — +0.67
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1709 138.3 — — — — +2 — -93 54.1% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 5–4 (56%) 104.9 -0.50
20 1989 1525 121.7 — — — — +38 — — 52.4% +0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.49 1991 1679 124.7 — — — — +46 — — 44.0% -0.44 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.42
21 1990 1577 126.7 — — — — +71 -98 — 43.9% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–6 (14%) 96.8 +0.78 1992 1658 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.08
22 1991 1682 133.2 — — — — -51 -22 -78 49.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 8–2 (80%) 106.6 -0.08 1993 1708 131.5 — — — — -20 — -17 49.1% +0.04 5–4 (56%) 2–6 (25%) 100.0 -0.63
23 1992 1645 120.9 — — — — +15 -10 — 41.0% -0.59 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 -0.65 1994 1768 146.2 — — — — -39 -242 +61 52.9% +0.14 8–3 (73%) 4–3 (57%) 110.7 -2.14
24 1993 1651 135.8 — — — — +45 -78 -87 41.7% -0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.7 -1.72 1995 1742 142.5 — — — — +5 -174 — 49.1% +0.21 1–6 (14%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.72
25 1994 1709 145.5 — — — — +28 — — 45.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -1.10 1996 1917 143.6 — — — — -150 -312 +118 63.9% +0.89 6–1 (86%) 1–2 (33%) 105.3 -1.70
26 1995 1701 136.6 — — — — -14 -37 -134 53.8% +0.30 6–11 (35%) 6–4 (60%) 96.8 -1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1996 1694 132.0 — — — — +28 -56 — 42.3% -0.48 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.18 1998 1895 99.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.03
28 1997 1596 120.8 — — — — +84 -20 — 25.8% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1778 139.7 — — — — +23 -42 -104 45.0% -0.32 33–44 (43%) 25–32 (44%) 97.2 -1.94 — 1928 144.8 — — — — -13 -243 +39 51.0% +0.12 28–22 (56%) 13–21 (38%) 105.1 -2.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.