H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tami Whitlinger Jones vs Naoko Kijimuta H2H: 2-0
Tami Whitlinger Jones holds a 2–0 lead over Naoko Kijimuta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1996 Australian Open first round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 54
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Tami Whitlinger Jones | 6-3 6-0 | Naoko Kijimuta | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1994* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Tami Whitlinger Jones | 6-4 7-5 | Naoko Kijimuta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | — | — | — | 1,786 | 106 | 135 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Naoko Kijimuta | #538 | #44 | 529 | 1,696 | 37 | 57 | 39.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tami Whitlinger Jones | Naoko Kijimuta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 13–19 | 40.6% | — | 1,651 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #45 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #74 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #279 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 10–13 | 43.5% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |