H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tami Whitlinger Jones vs Nicole Arendt H2H: 1-1

Tami Whitlinger Jones and Nicole Arendt are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Arendt won the 1994 Singapore Tennis Open round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Nicole Arendt
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Arendt #114 6-3 6-3 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data Apr 22, 1994* R16 Singapore Tennis Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tami Whitlinger Jones 6-1 6-2 Nicole Arendt #67 Match data Aug 11, 1993* R64 Manhattan Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,777 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nicole Arendt #433 #49 487 1,775 67 75 47.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tami Whitlinger Jones Nicole Arendt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1986 2–2 50.0% #164 1,537 0 0
17 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #366 1,519 0 0
20 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,576 0 0 1991 1–2 33.3% #218 1,523 0 0
22 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #124 1,570 0 0
23 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,644 0 0 1993 12–15 44.4% #88 1,602 0 0
24 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,650 0 0 1994 14–12 53.8% #73 1,700 0 0
25 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,709 0 0 1995 11–15 42.3% #117 1,666 0 0
26 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,700 0 0 1996 9–11 45.0% #79 1,675 0 0
27 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,694 0 0 1997 9–8 52.9% #63 1,753 0 0
28 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,596 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — 1999 5–4 55.6% #143 1,750 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% #433 1,732 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tami Whitlinger Jones Nicole Arendt
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1989 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1993 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1994 13 12 25 52.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1995 6 6 12 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 4 4 8 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1997 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 63 73 136 46.3% 24 35 59 40.7% 7 12 19 36.8% 12 15 27 44.4% — 39 42 81 48.1% 6 11 17 35.3% 21 15 36 58.3% 1 7 8 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tami Whitlinger Jones Nicole Arendt
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1537 112.1 — — — — +62 — — 50.0% +0.34 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.09
17 1986 1494 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.05 1987 1520 99.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.26
20 1989 1525 121.7 — — — — +38 — — 52.4% +0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1990 1577 126.7 — — — — +71 -98 — 43.9% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–6 (14%) 96.8 +0.78 1991 1523 110.9 — — — — +27 — — 42.9% -1.57 0–1 1–0 — -0.04
22 1991 1682 133.2 — — — — -51 -22 -78 49.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 8–2 (80%) 106.6 -0.08 1992 1570 112.2 — — — — +24 — — 47.1% -0.47 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.27
23 1992 1645 120.9 — — — — +15 -10 — 41.0% -0.59 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 -0.65 1993 1602 130.5 — — — — +19 — -10 44.6% -0.25 6–5 (55%) 1–1 — +0.08
24 1993 1651 135.8 — — — — +45 -78 -87 41.7% -0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.7 -1.72 1994 1701 125.2 — — — — -25 — -95 54.2% +0.41 3–4 (43%) 5–2 (71%) 102.1 -0.54
25 1994 1709 145.5 — — — — +28 — — 45.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -1.10 1995 1666 123.1 — — — — +1 -123 -43 43.9% -0.58 2–3 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 101.3 -1.61
26 1995 1701 136.6 — — — — -14 -37 -134 53.8% +0.30 6–11 (35%) 6–4 (60%) 96.8 -1.16 1996 1676 126.6 — — — — +9 -190 +55 43.5% -0.28 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 +0.40
27 1996 1694 132.0 — — — — +28 -56 — 42.3% -0.48 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.18 1997 1754 129.2 — — — — -82 -179 +12 50.0% -0.05 4–2 (67%) 0–1 — -0.90
28 1997 1596 120.8 — — — — +84 -20 — 25.8% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 -0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1751 114.1 — — — — — -192 +44 55.0% +0.25 1–1 1–1 — -0.33
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1732 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
Career — 1778 139.7 — — — — +23 -42 -104 45.0% -0.32 33–44 (43%) 25–32 (44%) 97.2 -1.94 — 1775 131.8 — — — — +2 -167 -8 47.3% -0.19 23–21 (52%) 17–16 (52%) 105.8 -1.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.