H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Tami Whitlinger Jones vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 1-1

Tami Whitlinger Jones and Sandra Cecchini are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 1–0 on clay, while Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1996 US Open first round 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tami Whitlinger Jones
USA Age 57
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 28, 1996* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Tami Whitlinger Jones 6-2 6-0 Sandra Cecchini #73 Match data
May 26, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Sandra Cecchini #32 6-1 6-4 Tami Whitlinger Jones Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Tami Whitlinger Jones — — — 1,786 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tami Whitlinger Jones Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1989 4–5 44.4% — 1,525 0 0 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1990 12–16 42.9% — 1,577 0 0 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1991 17–18 48.6% — 1,682 0 0 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1992 13–16 44.8% — 1,645 0 0 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1993 13–19 40.6% — 1,651 0 0 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1994 16–18 47.1% — 1,729 0 0 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1995 19–18 51.4% — 1,705 0 0 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1996 10–13 43.5% — 1,697 0 0 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1997 2–11 15.4% — 1,598 0 0 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 — — — — — — — 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11