H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Tamira Paszek vs Aiko Nakamura H2H: 2-0

Tamira Paszek holds a 2–0 lead over Aiko Nakamura in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2008 Los Angeles round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Aiko Nakamura
JPN Age 42 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamira Paszek 6-4 6-2 Aiko Nakamura #107 Match data Jul 23, 2008* R64 Los Angeles Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Tamira Paszek 6-4 6-0 Aiko Nakamura #78 Match data May 29, 2007* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Aiko Nakamura #730 #47 569 1,644 50 76 39.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamira Paszek Aiko Nakamura
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2 2004 1–2 33.3% #135 1,505 0 0
21 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3 2005 11–13 45.8% #71 1,568 0 0
22 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3 2006 19–18 51.4% #57 1,620 0 0
23 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3 2007 13–21 38.2% #66 1,548 0 0
24 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3 2008 5–18 21.7% #146 1,489 0 0
25 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3 2009 0–2 0.0% #224 1,461 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2010 1–1 50.0% #677 1,475 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #231 1,468 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tamira Paszek Aiko Nakamura
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2005 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 17 12 29 58.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 10 15 25 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 2 14 16 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
25 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — 40 56 96 41.7% 4 9 13 30.8% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 3 4 25.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's and 66/122 of Aiko Nakamura's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tamira Paszek Aiko Nakamura
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1% 2005 6/24 1.3 6.0 58.0% 59.3% 34.3% 50.4% 43.0% 48.8% 39.4%
22 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2% 2006 14/37 1.1 3.3 61.3% 60.8% 45.2% 44.1% 46.6% 54.5% 41.9%
23 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3% 2007 26/34 1.4 3.3 60.5% 58.9% 40.4% 46.5% 44.7% 51.7% 43.0%
24 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4% 2008 16/23 0.9 3.3 63.7% 55.8% 37.9% 44.0% 43.5% 49.4% 36.9%
25 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4% 2009 2/2 2.0 4.5 64.9% 51.5% 22.8% 39.7% 91.7% 41.0% 39.8%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 0.5 6.0 66.4% 47.6% 29.2% 33.8% 85.0% 41.3% 40.0%
Career — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1% — 66/126 1.2 3.6 61.5% 58.0% 39.4% 45.1% 47.3% 50.8% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tamira Paszek Aiko Nakamura
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40 2004 1505 108.0 — — — — +23 — — 33.3% -1.17 — 1–0 — -0.35
21 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21 2005 1568 117.9 -3.08 -1.83 0.770 44.8% +2 — — 45.8% -0.30 6–5 (55%) 1–5 (17%) 99.1 +0.24
22 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10 2006 1621 117.5 -1.07 -2.00 0.920 47.9% +24 -78 — 50.6% -0.13 5–6 (45%) 5–1 (83%) 101.1 +1.14
23 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22 2007 1548 108.1 -3.29 -1.84 0.891 47.2% -11 -43 +34 37.3% -0.84 5–4 (56%) 1–6 (14%) 97.1 +0.20
24 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30 2008 1489 112.6 -3.75 -4.17 0.729 43.7% -29 +17 +95 22.0% -2.16 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.7 -1.31
25 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03 2009 1461 93.4 -2.15 -0.86 0.675 40.3% — — — 20.0% -2.60 0–1 — — +0.24
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1475 101.1 -2.97 -1.43 0.680 40.8% — — — 40.0% -2.00 1–0 1–0 — -0.01
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1469 95.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.13
33 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48 — 1644 115.0 -2.87 -2.40 0.829 45.9% +1 -43 +65 39.6% -0.84 20–19 (51%) 11–13 (46%) 101.2 +0.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.