H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Tamira Paszek vs Camille Pin H2H: 1-0
Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Camille Pin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2008 Auckland fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 6-2 6-3 | Camille Pin | Match data | Jan 4, 2008* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Camille Pin | #1,143 | #61 | 752 | 1,619 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamira Paszek | Camille Pin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #175 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #136 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #169 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #117 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #116 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 | 2006 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #75 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #76 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #87 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #155 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |