H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Tamira Paszek vs Catalina Castano H2H: 0-1
Catalina Castano holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Catalina Castano leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Catalina Castano won the 2006 Istanbul fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
COL
Age 47
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalina Castano | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Tamira Paszek | Match data | May 26, 2006* | Istanbul | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Catalina Castano | #1,073 | #35 | 623 | 1,702 | 83 | 110 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tamira Paszek | Catalina Castano | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #144 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #194 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #135 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 | 2005 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #57 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #54 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #254 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #232 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |