H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Tamira Paszek vs Julia Schruff H2H: 2-0

Tamira Paszek holds a 2–0 lead over Julia Schruff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2009 Charleston Open first round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Julia Schruff
GER Age 44 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamira Paszek 7-5 6-2 Julia Schruff #140 Match data Apr 15, 2009* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Tamira Paszek 4-6 6-2 6-2 Julia Schruff #146 Match data Mar 15, 2008* R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Julia Schruff #1,200 #52 536 1,663 48 80 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tamira Paszek Julia Schruff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2 — — — — — — —
20 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2 2003 4–5 44.4% #117 1,508 0 0
21 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3 2004 5–12 29.4% #108 1,480 0 0
22 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3 2005 9–13 40.9% #81 1,565 0 0
23 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3 2006 18–24 42.9% #82 1,503 0 0
24 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3 2007 6–13 31.6% #119 1,463 0 0
25 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3 2008 5–7 41.7% #132 1,483 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2009 1–4 20.0% #131 1,473 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2010 0–2 0.0% #173 1,451 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tamira Paszek Julia Schruff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2003 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2004 3 5 8 37.5% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
22 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
24 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — 24 38 62 38.7% 24 36 60 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's and 58/128 of Julia Schruff's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tamira Paszek Julia Schruff
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5% 2003 1/9 0.0 0.0 82.0% 47.6% 66.7% 57.1% 36.4% 51.0% 43.8%
21 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1% 2004 3/17 7.7 3.3 59.0% 61.3% 45.7% 48.0% 59.7% 55.0% 45.7%
22 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2% 2005 6/22 1.0 3.3 58.1% 62.4% 41.7% 49.1% 41.1% 53.8% 40.8%
23 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3% 2006 19/42 0.9 1.4 63.1% 58.9% 40.7% 50.4% 44.7% 52.3% 42.4%
24 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4% 2007 14/19 0.8 3.1 63.8% 54.2% 49.1% 50.8% 53.8% 51.9% 47.6%
25 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4% 2008 9/12 0.7 3.0 61.8% 54.4% 37.0% 51.3% 44.7% 47.5% 46.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 4/5 1.3 5.3 62.1% 50.2% 42.1% 50.5% 54.6% 47.2% 46.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 2.5 1.0 47.2% 52.9% 47.1% 52.3% 63.6% 50.2% 31.5%
Career — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1% — 58/128 1.3 2.6 62.0% 56.6% 43.3% 50.6% 48.5% 51.3% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tamira Paszek Julia Schruff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40 2003 1508 104.6 -0.91 +0.18 0.894 47.6% — +36 — 45.0% -0.55 1–1 — — +0.22
21 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21 2004 1481 105.8 -1.07 -0.37 1.014 50.2% +22 -10 — 36.8% -0.66 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +0.61
22 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10 2005 1565 123.7 -0.34 -1.39 0.882 47.3% -9 -69 — 40.0% -0.76 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.91
23 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22 2006 1503 111.2 -2.40 -2.02 0.888 47.4% +31 +40 -7 41.7% -0.83 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 108.3 +1.04
24 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30 2007 1464 106.2 -2.66 +0.61 0.991 49.5% +24 +54 — 41.7% -0.58 2–8 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 94.5 +0.16
25 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03 2008 1484 103.8 -4.12 -0.06 0.877 47.1% +9 +29 — 48.0% -0.24 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 +0.59
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1474 99.8 -1.61 -1.47 0.875 46.4% +20 — — 18.2% -2.18 1–0 0–1 — -0.10
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1451 99.0 -3.11 -3.04 0.632 41.0% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.07
33 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48 — 1664 112.6 -2.39 -0.89 0.906 47.7% +18 +18 -7 40.2% -0.76 16–19 (46%) 12–10 (55%) 101.6 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.