H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 22:30 UTC
Tara Moore vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1
Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Tara Moore in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2016 Birmingham third round 4-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 33
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2016* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Tamira Paszek | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Tara Moore | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tara Moore | #1,067 | #145 | 382 | 1,549 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tamira Paszek | — | — | — | 1,801 | 99 | 128 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tara Moore | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #266 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,641 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #217 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #318 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 18–20 | 47.4% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2016 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #162 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #351 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #463 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #404 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |