H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tara Snyder vs Amber Liu H2H: 0-1

Amber Liu holds a 1–0 lead over Tara Snyder in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Amber Liu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amber Liu won the 2003 Stanford round of 32 2-6 6-3 6-2.

USA Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Amber Liu #354 2-6 6-3 6-2 Tara Snyder #162 Match data Jul 24, 2003* R32 Stanford Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tara Snyder #779 #33 769 1,717 45 67 40.2% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Amber Liu #1,089 #241 111 1,503 2 10 16.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tara Snyder Amber Liu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% 1,482 0 0
18 1995 0–1 0.0% #204 1,484 0 0 2003 1–2 33.3% #258 1,502 0 0
19 1996 0–1 0.0% #262 1,474 0 0 2004 0–3 0.0% #607 1,468 0 0
20 1997 1–2 33.3% #120 1,487 0 0
21 1998 20–14 58.8% #34 1,709 0 1 2006 0–1 0.0% #583 1,464 0 0
22 1999 11–20 35.5% #74 1,664 0 1 2007 0–1 0.0% #303 1,456 0 0
23 2000 8–13 38.1% #129 1,628 0 1 2008 1–2 33.3% #477 1,458 0 0
24 2001 1–4 20.0% #190 1,579 0 1
25 2002 1–2 33.3% #170 1,565 0 1
26 2003 3–4 42.9% #108 1,577 0 1
27 2004 0–6 0.0% #247 1,497 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tara Snyder Amber Liu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 3 3 0.0%
20 1997 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 6 7 13 46.2% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 2006 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1999 7 10 17 41.2% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2000 6 7 13 46.2% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2001 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2002 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2003 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2004 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 24 39 63 38.1% 11 14 25 44.0% 5 9 14 35.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 10 12 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tara Snyder Amber Liu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1483 96.8 0.0% -3.00 +0.23
18 1995 1484 98.5 0.0% -2.00 +0.12 2003 1502 121.7 +5.20 +3.79 0.478 38.0% +30 28.6% -2.00 1–0 -0.28
19 1996 1475 102.3 0.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.03 2004 1469 99.2 +0.78 -1.05 0.888 47.4% +16 25.0% -1.88 0–2 0–1 +0.24
20 1997 1488 121.1 +38 33.3% -0.83 1–0 -0.02
21 1998 1709 130.7 -53 -51 -84 54.1% +0.35 6–2 (75%) 3–1 (75%) 108.3 +0.74 2006 1464 100.3 33.3% -3.00 0–1 -0.05
22 1999 1664 126.1 -15 -37 -78 35.2% -1.13 6–3 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 106.4 -1.84 2007 1456 103.0 -0.34 -3.00 0.801 45.3% 33.3% -1.67 0–1 +0.06
23 2000 1629 120.4 +4 -13 39.1% -0.87 2–6 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.8 -1.19 2008 1458 99.8 -2.62 -0.84 0.676 42.7% +5 33.3% -1.67 +0.12
24 2001 1580 102.7 -2 25.0% -0.92 1–1 0–1 -0.09
25 2002 1566 100.0 -3 37.5% -1.38 1–1 0–1 +0.07
26 2003 1577 107.7 -12 38.5% -0.62 0–1 1–0 -0.22
27 2004 1497 94.8 -0.71 -0.07 0.714 41.9% +11 0.0% -3.40 0.00
Career 1718 126.4 -0.71 -0.07 0.714 41.9% -16 -36 -82 39.3% -0.70 16–14 (53%) 10–8 (56%) 106.2 -2.20 1503 108.5 +0.08 -0.39 0.701 43.2% +17 27.6% -2.04 1–4 (20%) 0–1 +2.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.