H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Akgul Amanmuradova H2H: 1-0

Tathiana Garbin holds a 1–0 lead over Akgul Amanmuradova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2002 Tashkent round of 32 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Akgul Amanmuradova
Uzbekistan Age 42 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #86 6-2 7-5 Akgul Amanmuradova Match data Jun 13, 2002* R32 Tashkent Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Akgul Amanmuradova #1,097 #50 1,031 1,630 61 102 37.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Akgul Amanmuradova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% — 1,481 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #607 1,471 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #307 1,465 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #380 1,450 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 2005 5–3 62.5% #197 1,507 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 2006 1–3 25.0% #204 1,490 0 0
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 2007 8–8 50.0% #96 1,528 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2008 15–22 40.5% #82 1,525 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2009 8–11 42.1% #85 1,539 0 0
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 2010 11–15 42.3% #70 1,579 0 0
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 2011 6–17 26.1% #114 1,492 0 0
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 2012 3–12 20.0% #198 1,455 0 0
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 2013 2–3 40.0% #227 1,483 0 0
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1 2014 2–2 50.0% #211 1,482 0 0
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1 2017 0–1 0.0% #375 1,489 0 0
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2019 0–1 0.0% #459 1,465 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2006 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 9 14 23 39.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 6 4 10 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 8 9 17 47.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 5 10 15 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 46 67 113 40.7% 15 26 41 36.6% 0 9 9 0.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's and 129/151 of Akgul Amanmuradova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/4 5.0 3.0 59.9% 63.9% 43.8% 38.8% 40.3% 56.9% 38.6%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 10/16 5.6 2.0 62.6% 66.8% 46.8% 60.7% 60.0% 59.2% 42.7%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/37 5.5 2.7 61.3% 65.6% 42.2% 60.2% 45.6% 56.6% 39.9%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 16/19 5.9 2.0 62.8% 66.7% 45.3% 56.1% 37.2% 58.6% 39.6%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% 2010 26/26 4.7 1.8 66.9% 64.3% 45.4% 50.3% 42.3% 58.0% 38.7%
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% 2011 22/23 3.1 2.4 66.6% 59.1% 44.4% 39.9% 46.2% 54.0% 36.7%
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% 2012 13/15 4.4 1.0 65.9% 59.9% 47.7% 48.7% 30.7% 56.1% 34.6%
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% 2013 4/5 6.3 2.3 66.5% 62.7% 43.8% 59.2% 47.1% 57.4% 34.0%
30 2007 25/36 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% 2014 4/4 4.5 1.3 75.1% 66.8% 43.4% 64.6% 31.1% 60.7% 39.8%
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% 2017 1/1 3.0 4.0 83.8% 38.7% 0.0% 33.3% — 32.4% 25.0%
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 1/1 2.0 3.0 55.6% 65.7% 32.1% 71.4% 0.0% 50.8% 28.6%
Career — 128/377 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.5% 53.0% 42.9% — 129/163 4.8 2.1 64.8% 63.6% 44.2% 52.8% 42.4% 56.8% 38.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Akgul Amanmuradova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1482 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.19
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1472 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.07
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1465 99.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.15
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1451 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.11
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 2005 1507 105.0 — — — — +16 — — 63.2% 0.00 1–2 (33%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.89
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 2006 1491 102.4 -0.77 -0.65 0.896 48.1% +3 — — 22.2% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.12
23 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 2007 1529 108.8 +0.69 -2.00 1.048 51.1% -9 — — 48.6% -0.28 2–3 (40%) 5–1 (83%) 102.9 +0.73
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2008 1525 120.6 +0.62 -3.54 0.919 48.6% +1 +77 — 42.2% -0.54 4–5 (44%) 4–7 (36%) 99.4 +0.30
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2009 1539 105.7 +1.49 -2.51 0.958 49.4% +41 +3 — 44.2% -0.14 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 98.9 +1.76
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92 2010 1579 116.9 +1.35 -3.94 0.921 48.4% +27 -59 — 44.4% -0.28 2–2 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 +1.64
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 2011 1493 104.0 -1.69 -5.44 0.799 45.4% +59 -23 — 33.3% -1.56 0–4 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.6 +0.71
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 2012 1456 115.4 +0.74 -4.35 0.787 45.2% +39 +29 — 17.2% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 1–4 (20%) 98.5 -0.79
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 2013 1483 113.9 +0.82 -2.38 0.797 46.4% +27 — — 40.0% -0.40 — — — -0.31
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93 2014 1482 99.1 +0.09 -1.61 1.015 49.9% +28 — — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 — — +0.75
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47 2016 1502 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97 2017 1490 91.4 -0.67 -2.70 0.370 29.0% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.05
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1465 97.4 -1.53 -4.65 0.581 41.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1466 95.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1434 94.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01 — 1631 113.1 +0.44 -3.64 0.887 47.7% +22 +13 — 39.5% -0.71 15–21 (42%) 22–23 (49%) 97.8 +3.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.