H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Alexandra Stevenson H2H: 0-1

Alexandra Stevenson holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexandra Stevenson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Alexandra Stevenson won the 2001 Wimbledon round of 128 2-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Alexandra Stevenson
USA Age 45 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alexandra Stevenson #111 2-6 6-4 6-4 Tathiana Garbin #61 Match data Jun 27, 2001* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Alexandra Stevenson #805 #18 1,444 1,844 86 128 40.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Alexandra Stevenson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #371 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1997 0–2 0.0% #394 1,475 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1998 3–7 30.0% #132 1,477 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1999 13–11 54.2% #45 1,673 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2000 9–24 27.3% #92 1,520 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2001 15–15 50.0% #60 1,672 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 2002 31–24 56.4% #18 1,835 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 2003 13–26 33.3% #81 1,609 0 0
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 2004 0–7 0.0% #287 1,514 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #643 1,507 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2006 0–4 0.0% #398 1,463 0 0
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 2008 1–1 50.0% #211 1,475 0 0
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 2009 0–2 0.0% #218 1,447 0 0
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1 2011 1–3 25.0% #269 1,441 0 0
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Alexandra Stevenson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 11 15 26.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 23 16 39 59.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2003 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 48 75 123 39.0% 7 21 28 25.0% 15 14 29 51.7% 16 18 34 47.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's and 16/58 of Alexandra Stevenson's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Alexandra Stevenson
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/39 10.0 5.7 63.6% 66.8% 40.3% 71.7% 36.1% 56.9% 31.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/7 2.5 6.5 57.2% 64.5% 40.5% 31.3% 6.3% 53.7% 32.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 2.5 3.0 56.8% 56.9% 40.8% 55.2% 40.0% 50.1% 28.4%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% 2008 2/2 2.0 2.0 65.3% 65.1% 32.1% 50.0% 54.2% 54.4% 42.0%
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% 2009 2/2 3.5 6.0 56.0% 64.4% 41.2% 64.2% 28.3% 53.0% 35.5%
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 25/36 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% 2011 3/4 3.3 5.0 48.3% 53.5% 43.3% 51.5% 51.4% 48.2% 46.6%
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/377 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.5% 53.0% 42.9% — 16/214 4.1 4.6 57.5% 61.0% 40.1% 55.1% 37.5% 52.4% 35.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Alexandra Stevenson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1497 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.12
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1475 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.30
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1478 103.0 — — — — +11 — — 36.4% -1.05 0–2 0–1 — +0.97
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1674 132.4 — — — — -104 — +100 49.1% -0.36 8–1 (89%) 5–1 (83%) 112.3 -1.46
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1521 121.1 — — — — +12 -47 +192 32.9% -1.27 3–7 (30%) 5–4 (56%) 98.1 +0.34
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1673 133.8 — — — — -28 -210 +89 53.1% +0.08 4–4 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 104.9 -1.23
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 2002 1836 146.6 — — — — +21 -391 -146 53.7% +0.15 14–10 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 109.1 +0.07
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 2003 1610 118.0 +0.40 -2.78 0.731 44.9% +56 -204 +23 38.1% -0.79 4–8 (33%) 5–5 (50%) 94.0 +2.32
23 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 2004 1514 94.8 -0.12 -2.43 0.700 42.9% +34 — — 17.6% -2.30 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.16
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2005 1507 101.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.06
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2006 1464 99.6 -2.52 -4.98 0.569 40.6% +19 — — 0.0% -2.83 — 0–1 — -0.13
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 2008 1476 106.2 +1.20 +0.54 0.922 47.9% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — 1–0 — +0.22
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 2009 1448 97.2 -2.56 -1.28 0.756 44.4% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.14
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93 2011 1441 97.3 -2.94 -0.45 0.899 47.3% — — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–1 — -0.07
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1430 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1416 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01 — 1845 131.9 -1.29 -2.25 0.745 44.3% +9 -164 +56 42.6% -0.60 33–35 (49%) 34–26 (57%) 106.1 +0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.