H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Anna Smashnova H2H: 1-2
Anna Smashnova holds a 2–1 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Anna Smashnova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2006 Palermo fourth round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 50
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2006* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Tathiana Garbin | 7-5 6-3 | Anna Smashnova | Match data |
| Jul 17, 2005* | Modena | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Anna Smashnova | 6-6 (ret.) | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1999* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Anna Smashnova | 7-5 6-7 6-2 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Anna Smashnova | #994 | #15 | 1,616 | 1,882 | 242 | 221 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Anna Smashnova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #236 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #139 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #68 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #132 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #49 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #47 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #46 | 1,668 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #88 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 43–25 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,793 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,857 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,700 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #921 | 1,648 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |