H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 1-0

Tathiana Garbin holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2002 Sopot quarterfinal 6-1 6-1.

ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #90 6-1 6-1 Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #26 Match data Jul 26, 2002* QF Sopot Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin — #22 1,255 1,741 171 210 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario — #1 3,768 2,384 720 271 72.7% 4 6 0 12 7 29

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1986 15–10 60.0% #81 1,620 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 12–13 48.0% #54 1,639 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 31–16 66.0% #18 1,785 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1989 47–13 78.3% #5 2,065 1 3
18 — — — — — — — 1990 38–14 73.1% #7 2,080 1 5
19 — — — — — — — 1991 56–15 78.9% #5 2,167 1 6
20 — — — — — — — 1992 63–16 79.7% #4 2,283 1 8
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 1993 72–14 83.7% #2 2,248 1 12
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 1994 69–9 88.5% #2 2,333 3 20
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 1995 47–13 78.3% #3 2,167 3 22
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 1996 57–17 77.0% #2 2,117 3 24
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 1997 45–22 67.2% #9 2,026 3 24
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 1998 47–17 73.4% #4 2,034 4 26
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 1999 25–17 59.5% #17 1,923 4 27
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 2000 41–19 68.3% #9 1,932 4 27
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 2001 34–22 60.7% #17 1,796 4 29
30 2007 23–17 57.5% #36 1,670 0 1 2002 21–24 46.7% #53 1,634 4 29
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,567 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,608 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% — 1,574 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 2 4 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 4 9 55.6% 26 10 36 72.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 28 5 33 84.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 5 1 6 83.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 20 4 24 83.3% 22 6 28 78.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 31 5 36 86.1% 26 7 33 78.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 27 3 30 90.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1994 38 5 43 88.4% 24 2 26 92.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 20 8 28 71.4% 21 3 24 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 23 8 31 74.2% 23 5 28 82.1% 6 1 7 85.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 3 8 62.5%
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 28 8 36 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 9 8 17 52.9% 15 6 21 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 22 9 31 71.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 15 15 30 50.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 2007 10 7 17 58.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 9 13 22 40.9% 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 101 174 42.0% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 297 118 415 71.6% 329 102 431 76.3% 57 18 75 76.0% 37 33 70 52.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1620 109.9 — — — — -68 +75 — 57.1% +0.13 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 105.4 +3.20
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1639 128.0 — — — — -145 +141 — 48.1% -0.35 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.37
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1785 156.3 — — — — -239 +151 — 67.0% +1.55 0–5 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.9 -0.14
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2066 163.2 — — — — -271 +71 -441 74.2% +1.91 8–4 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 -3.01
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2081 165.6 — — — — -183 +86 -321 70.1% +1.57 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.5 -4.19
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 2168 175.0 — — — — -81 +83 -252 75.0% +2.29 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 103.4 -3.51
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2284 179.5 — — — — -5 +24 — 75.6% +1.86 10–8 (56%) 12–1 (92%) 107.1 -6.89
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 1993 2248 179.1 — — — — -9 +146 -280 77.4% +2.28 13–3 (81%) 8–6 (57%) 104.5 -2.91
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 1994 2334 179.3 — — — — -14 +77 -381 82.8% +2.52 12–6 (67%) 14–3 (82%) 105.3 -3.56
23 2000 1620 130.4 — — — — -94 +73 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 1995 2167 167.9 — — — — -23 +257 -97 73.5% +1.92 11–5 (69%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -1.09
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 1996 2118 172.0 — — — — -21 +231 +89 71.5% +1.61 13–6 (68%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -1.50
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 1997 2027 162.2 — — — — -3 +132 +232 64.2% +1.13 10–9 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +1.63
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.93 1998 2035 164.7 — — — — -10 +128 +211 66.4% +1.25 16–7 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 100.2 +1.12
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 1999 1924 153.3 — — — — +11 +138 +206 55.2% +0.49 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 -0.61
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 2000 1933 158.0 — — — — -18 +139 +277 62.9% +0.64 14–6 (70%) 9–0 (100%) 108.9 -1.56
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 2001 1797 144.3 — — — — -25 +299 — 56.9% +0.68 12–8 (60%) 5–10 (33%) 89.3 +1.17
30 2007 1670 125.7 -1.15 -0.11 0.977 49.1% -47 +107 -199 57.5% +0.45 6–2 (75%) 4–2 (67%) 106.3 +2.40 2002 1635 126.7 — — — — +18 +228 — 47.0% -0.12 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 92.1 +1.10
31 2008 1568 113.7 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +55 +60 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.6 -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 1608 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -20 +74 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.1 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +27 +33 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.0 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1574 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1742 125.6 -1.67 -0.77 0.912 48.0% -20 +77 -199 46.8% -0.25 53–60 (47%) 42–36 (54%) 102.3 +0.85 — 2385 171.0 — — — — -40 +138 -56 68.5% +1.46 151–93 (62%) 92–61 (60%) 103.1 -2.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.