H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Catalina Castano H2H: 1-1

Tathiana Garbin and Catalina Castano are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on clay, while Catalina Castano leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2008 Fes round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Catalina Castano
COL Age 47 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #49 4-6 6-3 6-3 Catalina Castano #116 Match data May 1, 2008* R32 Fes Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Catalina Castano #53 7-6(4) 7-5 Tathiana Garbin #75 Match data Jan 13, 2006* R16 Canberra Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Catalina Castano #1,073 #35 623 1,702 83 110 43.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Catalina Castano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #232 1,484 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #110 1,487 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 2001 5–9 35.7% #144 1,490 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 2002 3–2 60.0% #194 1,514 0 0
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 2003 2–3 40.0% #135 1,518 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2004 5–9 35.7% #113 1,533 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2005 22–18 55.0% #57 1,659 0 0
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 2006 22–25 46.8% #54 1,543 0 0
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 2007 10–20 33.3% #112 1,507 0 0
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 2008 5–10 33.3% #142 1,496 0 0
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 2009 0–2 0.0% #214 1,469 0 0
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1 2010 5–5 50.0% #189 1,499 0 0
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 2011 2–1 66.7% #254 1,514 0 0
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1 2012 1–2 33.3% #232 1,510 0 0
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1 2013 0–2 0.0% #202 1,489 0 0
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Catalina Castano
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 1 3 4 25.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 10 7 17 58.8% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 8 13 21 38.1% 14 9 23 60.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 5 13 18 27.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2011 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2013 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 26 45 71 36.6% 56 55 111 50.5% 0 9 9 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's and 80/171 of Catalina Castano's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Catalina Castano
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/5 1.0 2.0 62.5% 45.7% 38.1% 33.3% 33.3% 42.9% 39.6%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/14 0.3 3.7 64.4% 45.1% 37.0% 43.9% 46.7% 42.2% 37.8%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/40 3.6 2.8 58.6% 61.1% 43.2% 52.7% 40.0% 53.5% 41.1%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% 2006 20/47 2.1 2.7 61.3% 58.8% 42.7% 49.0% 49.5% 52.2% 42.3%
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% 2007 22/30 1.5 3.3 62.1% 58.1% 43.9% 50.7% 38.5% 52.8% 41.6%
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% 2008 11/15 1.4 3.7 61.4% 61.7% 48.0% 58.5% 56.5% 55.8% 42.0%
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% 2009 2/2 5.0 8.5 54.9% 64.2% 38.5% 51.0% 55.0% 52.6% 43.4%
30 2007 25/36 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% 2010 9/10 1.4 4.0 63.4% 60.6% 47.4% 45.7% 45.1% 55.5% 46.6%
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% 2011 3/3 1.7 11.0 60.6% 60.7% 34.9% 51.9% 55.9% 50.8% 46.8%
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% 2012 3/3 3.0 9.3 55.0% 58.9% 33.8% 42.4% 39.5% 47.8% 46.7%
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% 2013 1/2 0.0 5.0 48.9% 48.9% 46.8% 60.0% 30.8% 47.8% 47.9%
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/377 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.5% 53.0% 42.9% — 80/193 1.8 3.9 61.1% 58.8% 43.4% 50.3% 45.8% 52.6% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Catalina Castano
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1484 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.09
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1487 104.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — +0.23
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 2001 1490 107.2 — — — — +25 +45 — 38.2% -0.88 3–3 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 +0.20
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 2002 1514 106.3 — — — — — +72 — 53.3% -0.13 3–2 (60%) 1–0 — +0.40
23 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 2003 1519 101.5 -0.43 -0.17 0.693 41.3% — +60 — 41.7% -0.92 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.05
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2004 1534 115.0 -2.87 -1.32 0.653 40.4% -58 +59 — 37.1% -0.97 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — -0.75
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2005 1659 128.5 -0.94 -1.22 0.884 47.8% -48 +8 — 54.9% +0.40 5–6 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 101.1 -0.06
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92 2006 1544 112.6 -3.15 -1.99 0.886 47.4% -44 +184 -90 46.3% -0.27 8–10 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 98.5 +1.63
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 2007 1508 109.0 -1.79 -1.74 0.883 47.1% -38 +186 — 34.8% -1.20 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — -0.34
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 2008 1496 111.9 -0.13 -1.61 0.950 49.7% -7 +104 — 40.0% -0.43 1–4 (20%) 0–5 (0%) 91.5 -0.03
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 2009 1469 98.1 -1.31 +0.09 0.917 47.9% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 1–1 — +0.12
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93 2010 1500 109.3 -0.80 +0.20 1.048 50.9% — +86 — 54.2% +0.13 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.58
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12 2011 1514 102.2 +1.09 +0.50 0.951 49.0% — +93 — 50.0% -0.25 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.45
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47 2012 1511 101.0 -0.68 -1.14 0.894 47.6% — — — 37.5% -0.50 1–1 — — -0.10
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97 2013 1489 99.9 +1.69 -0.59 0.918 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–2 — — -0.12
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01 — 1702 117.4 -1.56 -1.33 0.901 47.8% -38 +97 -90 44.4% -0.42 32–39 (45%) 21–21 (50%) 96.8 +1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.