H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Elena Likhovtseva H2H: 1-3
Elena Likhovtseva holds a 3–1 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elena Likhovtseva leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 2005 US Open first round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2005* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 6-4 6-1 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2002* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 6-4 6-1 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2001* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tathiana Garbin | 6-2 6-3 | Elena Likhovtseva | Match data |
| Aug 24, 2000* | New Haven | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Elena Likhovtseva | 6-1 6-3 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Elena Likhovtseva | #1,092 | #15 | 1,807 | 1,912 | 358 | 338 | 51.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Elena Likhovtseva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #67 | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #62 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #18 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #26 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 34–29 | 54.0% | #18 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #21 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #42 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #43 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,665 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1044 | 1,634 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |