H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Els Callens H2H: 0-1
Els Callens holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Els Callens leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Els Callens won the 2002 US Open first round 6-0 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Els Callens | 6-0 2-6 6-1 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Els Callens | #473 | #43 | 582 | 1,716 | 82 | 127 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Els Callens | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #188 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #110 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #95 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #51 | 1,692 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #102 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #100 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #177 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #67 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #73 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #224 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |