H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Emmanuelle Gagliardi H2H: 3-0

Tathiana Garbin holds a 3–0 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Tathiana Garbin leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2007 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Emmanuelle Gagliardi
SUI Age 50 Right-Handed 171 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #33 3-6 6-2 6-1 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #111 Match data Jan 17, 2007* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Tathiana Garbin #62 6-3 2-6 6-2 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #115 Match data Sep 22, 2006* R16 Portoroz Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Tathiana Garbin #86 5-7 6-4 7-5 Emmanuelle Gagliardi #81 Match data May 2, 2003* R16 Bol Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Emmanuelle Gagliardi #736 #42 781 1,695 118 183 39.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Emmanuelle Gagliardi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 0–3 0.0% #229 1,465 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1996 2–1 66.7% #123 1,504 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1997 7–9 43.8% #78 1,531 0 0
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 1998 5–12 29.4% #101 1,497 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 1999 11–14 44.0% #68 1,563 0 0
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 2000 13–20 39.4% #95 1,546 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 2001 10–17 37.0% #69 1,546 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2002 19–23 45.2% #61 1,583 0 0
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 2003 25–23 52.1% #56 1,608 0 0
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 2004 8–18 30.8% #105 1,524 0 0
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 2005 10–15 40.0% #95 1,505 0 0
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 2006 7–17 29.2% #115 1,470 0 0
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1 2007 1–10 9.1% #131 1,408 0 0
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 2008 0–1 0.0% #261 1,401 0 0
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 3 3 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 4 7 11 36.4% 8 10 18 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 14 14 28 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 15 14 29 51.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 4 11 15 26.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 2 6 8 25.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 3 7 10 30.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2007 0 6 6 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 47 83 130 36.2% 59 76 135 43.7% 12 18 30 40.0% 0 6 6 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's and 32/135 of Emmanuelle Gagliardi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% 2003 5/48 2.2 1.0 58.2% 63.7% 37.7% 50.1% 43.2% 52.8% 41.8%
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% 2004 5/26 0.6 1.6 62.8% 59.3% 46.5% 44.8% 43.3% 54.0% 36.6%
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% 2005 5/25 2.6 4.0 59.1% 65.7% 44.8% 58.1% 45.5% 57.0% 42.8%
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% 2006 9/24 1.3 4.2 67.0% 59.1% 40.0% 31.3% 67.4% 52.8% 42.6%
30 2007 25/36 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% 2007 7/11 0.4 3.1 65.3% 53.5% 47.4% 57.3% 34.3% 52.0% 37.1%
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% 2008 1/1 0.0 4.0 69.0% 57.5% 44.4% 42.9% 25.0% 53.4% 38.1%
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 128/377 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.5% 53.0% 42.9% — 32/301 1.3 3.0 63.4% 59.6% 43.2% 46.6% 47.9% 53.5% 40.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Emmanuelle Gagliardi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1465 97.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.25 0–2 1–0 — +0.03
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1504 108.4 — — — — — +73 — 62.5% +0.13 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.16
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1532 110.3 — — — — -57 +95 +68 47.5% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 98.0 +1.15
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 1998 1498 101.3 — — — — -92 +128 — 35.7% -1.26 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 +1.10
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 1999 1563 123.3 — — — — — +85 +21 43.4% -0.13 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 98.5 -0.71
23 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 2000 1546 120.4 — — — — -122 +106 0 42.1% -0.54 4–6 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 96.9 0.00
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 2001 1547 114.9 — — — — -78 +8 +74 42.6% -0.53 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.16
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2002 1584 127.0 — — — — -19 -57 — 46.5% -0.13 7–8 (47%) 6–5 (55%) 101.4 -0.34
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92 2003 1608 119.0 -1.11 -1.05 0.887 47.4% +3 -1 +6 49.1% -0.17 8–6 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 105.1 +1.34
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 2004 1525 104.1 -0.28 -2.38 0.796 45.6% -6 +29 +75 33.9% -1.36 3–6 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 98.5 +0.11
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 2005 1506 106.9 +0.17 -1.19 0.996 50.0% -24 +72 — 38.2% -0.60 6–1 (86%) 1–3 (25%) 105.3 +0.98
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 2006 1470 101.7 -2.03 -1.17 0.901 47.9% -33 +50 +92 34.6% -0.96 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 95.9 +0.09
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93 2007 1409 97.3 -2.52 -2.76 0.774 44.8% -23 +90 — 12.5% -2.50 1–1 — — +0.05
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12 2008 1401 100.1 -0.04 -2.40 0.818 45.5% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.05
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01 — 1696 117.4 -1.31 -1.73 0.865 47.0% -33 +56 +46 41.2% -0.60 45–59 (43%) 33–33 (50%) 100.5 +1.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.