H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Tathiana Garbin vs Jill Craybas H2H: 1-0

Tathiana Garbin holds a 1–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tathiana Garbin won the 2009 Acapulco round of 32 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tathiana Garbin #59 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3 Jill Craybas #89 Match data Feb 26, 2009* R32 Acapulco International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,693 161 257 38.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Tathiana Garbin Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,496 0 1
30 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,612 0 1
31 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,567 0 1
32 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1 2008 22–26 45.8% #64 1,571 0 1
34 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,590 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,448 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Tathiana Garbin Jill Craybas
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2002 12 8 20 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 11 14 25 44.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 10 14 24 41.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 10 15 25 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 13 15 28 46.4% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
33 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 14 15 29 48.3% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 9 12 21 42.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 13 19 31.6% 5 8 13 38.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 11 14 21.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — 104 152 256 40.6% 44 77 121 36.4% 12 22 34 35.3% 1 6 7 14.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's and 212/350 of Jill Craybas's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Tathiana Garbin Jill Craybas
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9% 2003 3/38 0.3 3.0 64.3% 52.0% 37.3% 34.9% 52.8% 47.1% 35.2%
29 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5% 2004 6/33 0.2 2.2 63.7% 60.8% 46.8% 53.4% 42.0% 55.7% 45.5%
30 2007 25/36 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5% 2005 7/42 0.6 3.1 66.5% 54.8% 41.1% 49.7% 52.7% 50.1% 46.6%
31 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5% 2006 24/43 1.1 3.0 63.8% 58.5% 43.9% 52.8% 54.0% 53.3% 45.2%
32 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1% 2007 29/39 1.1 2.6 62.4% 54.5% 45.8% 48.4% 50.3% 51.3% 42.8%
33 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3% 2008 40/48 0.8 3.3 66.3% 58.5% 43.8% 50.7% 47.2% 53.7% 46.8%
34 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5% 2009 31/33 0.5 3.7 62.0% 58.5% 41.9% 45.7% 48.8% 52.3% 43.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 34/35 1.1 2.9 64.2% 58.1% 40.4% 43.9% 50.1% 52.0% 41.2%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 25/26 0.7 2.8 62.7% 56.2% 40.4% 52.8% 38.8% 50.4% 38.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 10/10 0.5 3.1 65.4% 54.2% 35.3% 44.1% 56.6% 47.6% 41.2%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 3/3 0.7 3.3 63.5% 49.9% 34.0% 44.0% 42.9% 44.5% 41.0%
Career — 128/377 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.5% 53.0% 42.9% — 212/418 0.8 3.1 63.9% 57.2% 42.2% 48.5% 48.6% 51.9% 43.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Tathiana Garbin Jill Craybas
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11 1996 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.11
22 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40 1998 1473 98.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.19
24 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37 1999 1445 107.1 — — — — +24 — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–2 — -0.12
25 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83 2000 1450 103.4 — — — — +23 — — 42.9% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.02
26 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92 2001 1479 110.7 — — — — +12 -6 — 36.2% -0.76 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 +0.19
27 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03 2002 1653 112.4 — — — — -22 -155 -43 47.4% -0.45 10–4 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 110.1 +0.70
28 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08 2003 1568 113.2 -2.11 -2.34 0.665 41.6% +3 -51 +44 41.7% -0.71 5–7 (42%) 6–4 (60%) 99.2 +1.02
29 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63 2004 1496 110.5 +0.38 -0.09 1.027 50.9% +36 -67 +114 36.4% -0.95 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.3 +1.31
30 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93 2005 1613 122.1 -2.41 +0.28 0.934 48.6% -42 -142 +91 47.6% -0.21 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 -0.12
31 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12 2006 1568 125.6 -2.28 +0.59 0.968 49.4% +22 -85 +99 43.4% -0.28 6–9 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 96.1 +0.78
32 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47 2007 1472 114.0 -3.51 -1.24 0.880 47.3% +42 -2 +117 36.0% -1.19 3–8 (27%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -1.20
33 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97 2008 1571 125.0 -1.47 +1.80 1.013 50.2% +18 -32 — 47.7% 0.00 4–7 (36%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 +0.82
34 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20 2009 1591 120.2 -2.51 -0.54 0.914 48.2% +29 -121 — 39.5% -0.76 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.8 -0.89
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1546 110.5 -3.17 -1.80 0.858 46.7% +33 -58 -16 34.6% -1.23 5–5 (50%) 4–0 (100%) — +0.09
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1442 107.4 -4.00 -4.02 0.783 44.8% +81 0 — 30.0% -1.53 2–6 (25%) 0–1 — +0.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1449 101.1 -4.12 -1.62 0.786 44.7% +63 +2 — 38.1% -1.71 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.9 +0.05
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1451 96.4 -3.73 -1.77 0.738 42.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.02
Career — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01 — 1694 119.3 -2.71 -0.73 0.898 47.7% +18 -60 +55 40.2% -0.73 58–79 (42%) 41–43 (49%) 96.8 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.