H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Tathiana Garbin vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 0-1
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 1–0 lead over Tathiana Garbin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 2000 Sydney Olympics second round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2000* | Sydney Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-4 6-2 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,726 | 168 | 209 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,023 | 340 | 221 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Tathiana Garbin | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #42 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #58 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,916 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,558 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #15 | 1,836 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |